[2004] KEHC 2530 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant had served a substantial part of his sentence, had only two months remaining, and had demonstrated remorse and rehabilitation by acquiring vocational skills and equipment. The court took judicial notice of the government policy to decongest prisons and promote employment. In light...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 2530 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Kenneth Munyua Irungu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 312 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed
- Judges
- JW Lessit
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Appeal Against Sentence, Prison Decongestion Policy
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Munyua Irungu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellant was harsh or excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the appellant's remorse, reformation, and acquisition of vocational skills constitute sufficient grounds for reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant had served a substantial part of his sentence, had only two months remaining, and had demonstrated remorse and rehabilitation by acquiring vocational skills and equipment. The court took judicial notice of the government policy to decongest prisons and promote employment. In light of these factors, the court held that allowing the appeal and ordering the appellant's release would serve the interests of justice in this particular case.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The appellant is to be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Criminal Appeal 312 of 2003
(From original conviction (s) and Sentence(s) in Criminal case No. 1814 of 2002 of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi (El-Kindy - P.M.)
KENNETH MUNYUA IRUNGU.….……………............................……….…..APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC……………………...........................…………………………....RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
The Appellant KENNETH MUNYUA IRUNGU was charged and convicted of the offence of STEALING contrary to Section 279(a) of the Penal Code before the Chief Magistrate Court at Nairobi. Having been found guilty he was sentenced to serve 3 years imprisonment with 6 strokes of the cane.
When this Appeal came for hearing on 6/12/04, he informed the court that he wished to appeal only against the sentence. He submitted that he had only two months to finish his sentence. That he was remorseful and has now reformed. That he had qualified as a Cobbler Grade III. That he had been given tools and that he wished to go and start working.
MR. OLENGO, learned counsel for the State submitted that he was opposing the Appeal as the accused was sentenced to 3 years imprisonment and that was not harsh or excessive in the circumstances.
He further submitted that the Appellant had not given any grounds to warrant the court to reduce the sentence and that the fact he’s trained and had 2 months to go are not good grounds.
In reply the Appellant submitted that he had reformed and have equipments to start business with.
I have perused the records and made consideration of all relevant facts of this case. I have considered the fact that the Appellant has served a substantial part of his sentence and that he remains only with two months to finish the same. I have also considered the fact that he was rightfully convicted and was given a chance to mitigate.
In my judgment, I refer to the government policy of decongesting the prisons and find that since the Appellant remains only 2 months to finish his sentence, and that he is remorseful, and also considering the fact that he has gained skills and equipment to work as a Cobbler, allowing the Appeal to succeed with serve the interest of justice of this particular case.
I have also considered the government policy of “a working nation” and find that such work as he will do with his newly acquitted skills with enhance the said policy.
As such I allow the Appeal and order that the Appellant be released forthwith unless he is otherwise charged in connection with another offence.
Dated at Nairobi this 8th day of December 2004.
LESIIT
JUDGE
Read, signed and delivered in the presence of;
LESIIT
JUDGE