[2007] KEHC 1590 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 1590 (KLR)

The court found that there was credible prima facie evidence that the funds held in the respondent's account were acquired as a result of corrupt conduct, as the funds originated from an account previously subject to a prohibitory order for similar reasons. The court further held that the statutory term 'property'...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 1590 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission; Respondent: Celeron Business Systems
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 861 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Prohibitory Order Under Section 56 of the Anti Corruption and Economic Crimes Act
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Anti Corruption Orders, Prohibitory Injunctions, Asset Freezing, Economic Crimes
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Anti Corruption Orders Prohibitory Injunctions Asset Freezing Economic Crimes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission

Applicant

Celeron Business Systems

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Prohibitory Order Under Section 56 of the Anti Corruption and Economic Crimes Act

  1. 1 Whether there is credible prima facie evidence that the funds in the respondent's account were acquired as a result of corrupt conduct.
  2. 2 Whether the term 'property' under section 56(1) of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act includes money.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was credible prima facie evidence that the funds held in the respondent's account were acquired as a result of corrupt conduct, as the funds originated from an account previously subject to a prohibitory order for similar reasons. The court further held that the statutory term 'property' under section 56(1) of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act encompasses money, thereby empowering the court to issue a prohibitory order over the funds in question. Accordingly, the application for a prohibitory order was allowed.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • A prohibitory order is granted prohibiting the withdrawal, transfer, disposal of, or other dealings with the money held in Account No. 0110905125500 in the name of Celeron Business Systems at Co-operative Bank of Kenya.
  • The order and application shall be served upon the respondent within seven days of delivery of the ruling.