[2020] KEELC 3583 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case that the suit land is public land reserved as a beach access road and that its allocation and subsequent dealings were irregular and potentially fraudulent. The absence of any response or opposition from the 1st defendant left the plaintiff's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 3583 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission; Defendant: Galerius Investment Ltd; Defendant: Jabu Salim; Defendant: Zablon Angwata; Defendant: Wilson Gachanja; Defendant: Chief Land Registrar
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 88 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Application for injunction allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Public Land Allocation, Injunctive Relief, Fraudulent Land Title
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission
Plaintiff
Galerius Investment Ltd
Defendant
Jabu Salim
Defendant
Zablon Angwata
Defendant
Wilson Gachanja
Defendant
Chief Land Registrar
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit land is public land reserved as a beach access road.
- 2 Whether the 1st defendant should be restrained from dealing with or constructing on the suit land pending determination of the suit.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case for grant of an injunction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case that the suit land is public land reserved as a beach access road and that its allocation and subsequent dealings were irregular and potentially fraudulent. The absence of any response or opposition from the 1st defendant left the plaintiff's evidence uncontroverted. The court held that if the injunction was not granted, there was a risk of further dealings or construction on the land, which could defeat the purpose of the suit. The balance of convenience favored preserving the status quo until the suit is heard and determined. Accordingly, the court granted the orders of injunction and inhibition as sought by the...
Court Disposition
Application for injunction allowed.
Orders
- An order of injunction is issued restraining the 1st defendant from selling, charging, leasing, sub-dividing, or otherwise dealing with the suit land.
- An order of inhibition is issued restricting the registration of any disposition in the register of the suit land.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT MOMBASA
ELC NO. 88 OF 2019
KENYA ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION...............................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
GALERIUS INVESTMENT LTD.............................................1ST DEFENDANT
JABU SALIM.............................................................................2ND DEFENDANT
ZABLON ANGWATA................................................................3RD DEFENDANT
WILSON GACHANJA..............................................................4TH DEFENDANT
CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR.....................................................5TH DEFENDANT
RULING
(Application for injunction; plaintiff claiming that suit land is a public access road and seeking to have 1st defendant restrained from dealing in it or undertaking any construction; application not opposed; application allowed.)
1. This suit was commenced through a plaint which was filed on 16 May 2019. The case of the plaintiff is that the land parcel Kwale/Diani Beach Block/1072 (the suit land) is on land reserved as a public beach access road. It is the case of the plaintiff that this land was illegally allocated to one Boy Juma Boy on 23 June 1994 and a Certificate of Lease illegally issued to the 1st defendant. It is pleaded that the 2nd defendant prepared a fraudulent Part Development Plan (PDP) to facilitate the irregular allocation. The 3rd and 4th defendants who served as Commissioners of Land, are also alleged to have participated in the fraud and/or were negligent. In the suit, the plaintiff wishes to recover the land by a cancellation of the title of the 1st defendant.
2. Alongside the plaint, the plaintiff filed an application seeking orders to have the 1st defendant restrained from dealing with the land or undertaking construction in it pending the hearing of the suit. It is that application which is the subject of this ruling. Despite being served, the 1st defendant has not filed any response to the application and has indeed not entered an appearance to the suit.
3. The supporting affidavit is sworn by Samuel Murage, an investigator working with the plaintiff. He has annexed various documents which he has averred demonstrate that the suit land is public land. I have no material tendered by the 1st defendant to contradict what the plaintiff has contended and I am of the view that the plaintiff has thus demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success. If the injunction is not granted, further dealings may be entered into and/or construction undertaken, which may defeat this suit. The balance of convenience also tilts towards maintaining the land until this suit is heard and determined.
4. I therefore allow the application. I issue an order of injunction restraining the 1st defendant from selling, charging, leasing, sub-dividing, or in any other way entering into any dealings over the suit land. I also issue an order of inhibition, restricting the registration of any disposition in the register of the suit land.
5. Costs will be to the plaintiff.
6. Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at MOMBASA this 12th day of February, 2020.
_______________________
MUNYAO SILA,
JUDGE.
IN THE PRESENCE OF:
Ms. Abdulrahim for the plaintiff.
Mr. Mogaka for the 3rd defendant.
Mr Mwandeje for the 5th defendant.
Other parties; Absent.
Court Assistant; David Koitamet.