[2015] KEELRC 77 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 77 (KLR)

The court found that the interim orders sought by the Petitioners were substantially similar to the final reliefs sought in the main petition. Granting such orders at the interlocutory stage would amount to a premature determination of the substantive issues, which is an abuse of the court process. The court further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 77 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Association of Private Employment Agencies through Fabian K. Muli; Applicant: Forbes Global Agency; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary Ministry for Labour Social Security & Services; Respondent: The Attorney General; Respondent: The Inspector General of Police
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 90 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
Outcome
Application dismissed in part; only order for release of passports granted; no order as to costs.
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Conservatory Orders, Licensing of Employment Agencies, Administrative Action, Labour Migration Regulation
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Administrative Law Conservatory Orders Licensing of Employment Agencies Administrative Action Labour Migration Regulation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Association of Private Employment Agencies through Fabian K. Muli

Applicant

Forbes Global Agency

Applicant

Cabinet Secretary Ministry for Labour Social Security & Services

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

The Inspector General of Police

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the Petitioners are entitled to conservatory orders restraining the Respondents from interfering with their business operations pending the hearing of the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondents acted unlawfully in seizing the Petitioners' property and failing to provide reasons for their actions.
  3. 3 Whether the interim reliefs sought would amount to a determination of the main petition at the interlocutory stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the interim orders sought by the Petitioners were substantially similar to the final reliefs sought in the main petition. Granting such orders at the interlocutory stage would amount to a premature determination of the substantive issues, which is an abuse of the court process. The court further held that, while the Petitioners alleged unlawful seizure of property, the only specific property identified was passports, and the police indicated willingness to release them upon a court order and proof of ownership. Accordingly, the court ordered that any passports held by the police be released directly to their holders upon adequate proof of ownership. All other prayers...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed in part; only order for release of passports granted; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Any passports held by the police to be released directly to the holders upon adequate proof of ownership.
  • All other prayers in the application are dismissed.