[2021] KEELRC 1535 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1535 (KLR)

The court held that since the conciliation report was issued ten months after the suit was filed, and the claimant had initiated both court proceedings and conciliation simultaneously, there was no basis for review. The court emphasized that commencing litigation before the conclusion of conciliation was a waste of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1535 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Aviation Workers Union; Respondent: AGS Worldwide Movers Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 46 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Motion for Review
Outcome
motion for review dismissed
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Conciliation Process, Review of Judgment, Parallel Proceedings
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Conciliation Process Review of Judgment Parallel Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Aviation Workers Union

Applicant

AGS Worldwide Movers Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Ruling on Motion for Review

  1. 1 Whether the court should review its judgment in light of a conciliator's report issued after the suit was filed.
  2. 2 Whether parallel pursuit of conciliation and litigation is permissible under employment law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the conciliation report was issued ten months after the suit was filed, and the claimant had initiated both court proceedings and conciliation simultaneously, there was no basis for review. The court emphasized that commencing litigation before the conclusion of conciliation was a waste of judicial time and that the subsequent conciliation report could not be used to revisit or alter the judgment already delivered. The motion for review was therefore dismissed, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

motion for review dismissed

Orders

  • The motion for review is dismissed.
  • Each party is to bear their own costs.