[2013] KEELRC 125 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant had recruited 19 out of 35 unionisable employees, constituting more than a simple majority at the time of filing the suit. The termination of two employees did not affect the claimant's majority, as those employees were not among the union members. The court held that the statutory...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEELRC 125 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Building, Construction, Timber, Furniture; Respondent: __MISSING__
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 56 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment and Labour Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Union Recognition, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Union Membership Threshold
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Building, Construction, Timber, Furniture
Applicant
__MISSING__
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to an order compelling the respondent to sign a Recognition Agreement.
- 2 Whether the claimant met the statutory threshold for union recognition under the Trade Dispute Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant had recruited 19 out of 35 unionisable employees, constituting more than a simple majority at the time of filing the suit. The termination of two employees did not affect the claimant's majority, as those employees were not among the union members. The court held that the statutory requirements for union recognition were satisfied, and the respondent was obligated to sign a Recognition Agreement and commence deduction and remittance of union dues as per the law.
Court Disposition
claim allowed
Orders
- The respondent is ordered and directed to accord and sign a Recognition Agreement in favour of the claimant.
- The respondent is ordered to forthwith commence deducting union dues from the salaries of union members and remit them to the claimant every month.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
12 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
KENYA BUILDING, CONSTRUCTION, TIMBER, FURNITURE
VERSUS
On 26/10/2010 the claimant brought this suit seeking orders to compel the respondent to sign Recognition Agreement with her and thereafter the two parties to conclude Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). The basis of the suit is that the claimant recruited 19 of the 23 members of staff for the respondent, caused them to sign check off form authorizing deductions of union dues from their salaries and forwarded the same to the respondent. That the respondent failed to comply with the check-off forms which cited the ministerial order made on 23/12/2005 under Section 45 of the Trade Dispute Act. According to the claimant, she recruited members of the union represented over 78% of the total unionisable workers.
The issues for determination arising from the pleadings and submissions are:
Whether the order sought ought to issue.
In the present case, the claimant recruited 19 members according to the check off forms produced as exhibit. The total number of staff for the respondent was 37 according to the list of staff members produced by the respondent. Two out of the 37 members of staff were terminated leaving a balance of 35. The two employees terminated were not among the members recruited by the claimant and therefore termination of the workers gave advantage to the claimant. It is therefore obvious that as at the time of bringing the suit the 19 members recruited represented more than a simple majority of the respondent's unionisable staff. The claimant therefore satisfied the criterion for granting recognition. Whether the number was later reduced through the so called malicious victimization, the position did not change.
Consequently, the court hereby orders and directs the respondent to accord and sign Recognition Agreement in favour of the claimant and to forthwith commence deducting union dues from salary of the union members in her establishment and remit to the claimant every month. Each party shall bore her own costs.
Signed dated and delivered this 4th October 2013
JUDGE