[2019] KEELRC 1870 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1870 (KLR)

The court found that the grievant was employed by the respondent, earned a daily wage of Kshs. 700, and was summarily dismissed without notice or valid reason. The respondent failed to participate in the proceedings despite being served, and earlier efforts at conciliation and settlement were ignored. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1870 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Building Construction Timber & Furniture Industries Employees Union; Respondent: Shariff Abdalla M. Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 279 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Summary Dismissal, Terminal Benefits, Notice Pay, Pro Rata Leave, Service Pay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Summary Dismissal Terminal Benefits Notice Pay Pro Rata Leave Service Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Building Construction Timber & Furniture Industries Employees Union

Applicant

Shariff Abdalla M. Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the grievant's employment was unfairly terminated without notice or valid reason.
  2. 2 Whether the grievant is entitled to terminal benefits and compensation for unfair termination.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent failed to follow due process in terminating the grievant's employment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the grievant was employed by the respondent, earned a daily wage of Kshs. 700, and was summarily dismissed without notice or valid reason. The respondent failed to participate in the proceedings despite being served, and earlier efforts at conciliation and settlement were ignored. The court accepted the claimant's evidence that the grievant was not paid terminal benefits and that the termination was procedurally and substantively unfair. The court held that the grievant was entitled to notice pay, annual leave, pro-rata leave, service pay, salary for days worked in November 2015, and compensation equivalent to 12 months' salary for unfair termination. The respondent...

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay to the grievant, through the claimant union, notice, annual leave, pro-rata leave, service and salary for days worked in November 2015, at Kshs. 55,125.
  • The respondent shall pay to the grievant through the claimant, equivalent of 12 months’ salary in compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 218,400.