[2022] KEELRC 3783 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant failed to exhaust the mandatory conciliation process before filing the claim, as evidenced by the absence of a certificate from the conciliator under Section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007. The claimant admitted to rushing to court and did not comply with Rule 5 of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 3783 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Chemical Workers Union; Respondent: Beta Healthcare International Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E152 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Objection / Ruling
- Outcome
- preliminary_objection_upheld
- Judges
- J Rika
- Legal Topics
- Conciliation Process, Exhaustion of Remedies, Trade Dispute Reporting
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Chemical Workers Union
Applicant
Beta Healthcare International Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was required to exhaust the conciliation process before filing the claim in court.
- 2 Whether the absence of a certificate from the conciliator under Section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007, invalidates the claim.
- 3 Whether filing the claim before completion of conciliation constitutes abuse of court process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant failed to exhaust the mandatory conciliation process before filing the claim, as evidenced by the absence of a certificate from the conciliator under Section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007. The claimant admitted to rushing to court and did not comply with Rule 5 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016. The court emphasized that parallel conciliation and litigation processes over the same dispute constitute an abuse of process. Therefore, the preliminary objection was sustained, and the statement of claim was struck out for non-compliance with statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
preliminary_objection_upheld
Orders
- The preliminary objection is sustained.
- The statement of claim dated March 9, 2022 is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Kenya Chemical Workers Union v Beta Healthcare International Limited (Cause E152 of 2022) [2022] KEELRC 3783 (KLR) (22 July 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELRC 3783 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause E152 of 2022
J Rika, J
July 22, 2022
Between
Kenya Chemical Workers Union
Claimant
and
Beta Healthcare International Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Respondent filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated March 28, 2022, asking the Court to strike out the Statement of Claim and an Application filed under Certificate of Urgency by the Claimant, both dated March 9, 2022.
2. Principally, the Respondent states that the Claimant has not exhausted the conciliation process, having reported the existence of a trade dispute to the Ministry of Labour.
3. The report by the Claimant was made on February 8, 2022. The Conciliator, Grace Mweresa, was appointed on February 28, 2022.
4. It was agreed that the Preliminary Objection is considered on the strength of the Parties’ Submissions, which the Parties confirmed filing and exchanging at the last appearance in Court, on June 21, 2022.
The Court Finds: - 5. The Claimant concedes in its Submissions that indeed, it rushed to Court.
6. The Claimant has not exhibited a certificate issued by the Conciliator under Section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007, showing that the dispute has not been resolved by conciliation.
7. The Claimant reported the existence of the dispute to the Ministry on February 8, 2022. The Conciliator was appointed on February 28, 2022. Why would the Claimant file the Statement of Claim dated March 9, 2022, barely a week after the Conciliator was appointed? Has the Conciliator been given the opportunity to address the dispute?
8. In its rush, the Claimant did not comply with Rule 5 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court [Procedure] Rules, 2016.
9. It is noted that the Respondent also reported the existence of a trade dispute to the Ministry of Labour, through a letter dated February 4, 2022, albeit on separate but related issues, as those reported by the Claimant.
10. The Parties must submit to the conciliation process, and not rush to Court. It is in abuse of the process, to have conciliation and litigation processes running parallel, over the same dispute, between the same Parties.
11. The conciliation process must be exhausted, and if any Claim is to be filed before the Court, it be so filed in strict compliance with Rule 5 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court [Procedure] Rules, 2016.
It is Ordered: -a.The Preliminary Objection is sustained, and the Statement of Claim dated March 9, 2022 is struck out.b.No order on the costs.
DATED, SIGNED AND RELEASED TO THE PARTIES ELECTRONICALLY, AT CHAKA, UNDER THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND JUDICIARY COVID-19 GUIDELINES, THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 2022. JAMES RIKAJUDGE