https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/1508

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/1508

Because the respondent filed no response and produced no evidence of payment, the court held that it was entitled to adopt the annexed computation of arrears under Rule 69(1) and grant the application as prayed, subject to proof if payment had in fact already been made.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELRC 1508 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Kenya Chemical Workers Union; Respondent: Kenya Flexogravure Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 127 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Relations Cause; Ruling on Application for Adoption and Enforcement of Wage Arrears Computation / Ruling on Notice of Motion Dated 16 December 2025
Outcome
Application allowed
Judges
["AN Mwaure"]
Legal Topics
Adoption and Enforcement of Schedule of Arrears, Collective Bargaining Agreement Salary Increment, Contempt of Court, Default Judgment Like Enforcement, Costs
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Law Industrial Relations Civil Procedure Adoption and Enforcement of Schedule of Arrears Collective Bargaining Agreement Salary Increment Contempt of Court Default Judgment Like Enforcement Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Chemical Workers Union

Claimant/applicant

Kenya Flexogravure Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Relations Cause; Ruling on Application for Adoption and Enforcement of Wage Arrears Computation / Ruling on Notice of Motion Dated 16 December 2025

  1. 1 Whether the court should adopt the verified schedule of wage arrears as a judgment/order of the court
  2. 2 Whether the absence of any response or proof of payment justified enforcement
  3. 3 Whether the application met the threshold under Rule 69(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2024

Ratio Decidendi

Because the respondent filed no response and produced no evidence of payment, the court held that it was entitled to adopt the annexed computation of arrears under Rule 69(1) and grant the application as prayed, subject to proof if payment had in fact already been made.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • The detailed tabulation of wage arrears for the 31 unionisable employees was adopted as correct and lawful computation payable under clause 28 of the CBA and the consent orders.
  • The respondent was required to pay the respective sums set out in the schedule within 14 days of the order.