[2024] KEELRC 1221 (KLR)
The Respondent's refusal to implement the registered CBAs, despite statutory obligations under sections 59(5) and 60 of the Labour Relations Act and constitutional guarantees under Articles 27 and 41, constitutes a clear breach of both statutory and constitutional rights. The CBAs became effective upon registration,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 1221 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Chemical Workers Union; Respondent: Mac'S Pharmaceuticals Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E912 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant. Prayers granted as specified.
- Judges
- Nzioki wa Makau
- Legal Topics
- Collective Bargaining Agreements, Non Implementation of Cba, Unfair Labour Practices, Constitutional Labour Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Chemical Workers Union
Applicant
Mac'S Pharmaceuticals Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent's refusal to implement the registered Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) constitutes a breach of the Labour Relations Act, the Employment Act, and the Constitution of Kenya.
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to compel the Respondent to comply with the CBAs and pay accrued benefits and damages for breach of constitutional rights.
Ratio Decidendi
The Respondent's refusal to implement the registered CBAs, despite statutory obligations under sections 59(5) and 60 of the Labour Relations Act and constitutional guarantees under Articles 27 and 41, constitutes a clear breach of both statutory and constitutional rights. The CBAs became effective upon registration, and the Respondent was legally bound to implement them. The court found that the Respondent's conduct amounted to unfair labour practices and a violation of the Claimant's members' rights. Accordingly, the court granted declarations of breach, compelled compliance with the CBAs, ordered payment of accrued benefits and interest, awarded damages to the Claimant Union, and...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant. Prayers granted as specified.
Orders
- Declaration that the Respondent is in breach of Article 27 and 41 of the Constitution of Kenya and sections 59(5) and 60 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007.
- Respondent to comply with RCA 284 of 2022 and RCA 285 of 2022 forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Kenya Chemical Workers Union v Mac's Pharmaceuticals Limited (Cause E912 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1221 (KLR) (3 April 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 1221 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause E912 of 2023
Nzioki wa Makau, J
April 3, 2024
Between
Kenya Chemical Workers Union
Claimant
and
Mac'S Pharmaceuticals Limited
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Claimant filed this claim against the Respondent for relief against the Respondent for breach of various provisions of the Labour Relations Act, the Employment Act and the Constitution of Kenya. It was averred that the Claimant has a recognition agreement with the Respondent and has negotiated several CBAs on behalf of employees who are in the service of the Respondent.
2. The Claimant averred that despite all efforts to engage on the issue of Non- Implementation of the aforementioned Collective Bargaining Agreements the Respondent has and continues to violate the CBAs hence our efforts have proven futile. That failure to implement the negotiated and registered CBAs is an infringement on the rights of the Claimant’s members under Article 41 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. It was submitted that the parties to the CBAs are bound to the negotiated and registered CBAs by dint of section 59(2) of the Labour Relations Act 2007. The Claimant averred that the Respondent has no legal basis to refuse to implement the registered CBAs and should be compelled to pay the affected employees all their benefits and accrued arrears from the time the CBAs where to take effect.
3. The Claimant averred that after so many correspondences with the Respondent in which they have declined, failed, ignored, refused and or been adamant to implement the three (3) CBAs it had on 6th December 2022 reported this matter to the Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Labour and Social Protection in compliance with section 62(1) of the Labour Relations Act 2007. That on 19th April 2023 a conciliator Mr. Peter Bacha was appointed and that he invited parties for conciliation meeting on 10th May 2023 vide letter dated 3rd May 2023 and further on 25th July 2023. The Claimant averred that the Conciliator after hearing the parties issued his report on 30th August 2023 which it accepted on the same even date and that despite all conciliation meetings and several attempts to bring parties to an amicable conclusion in respect to this dispute which did not yield any success.
4. When the matter came up in Court for hearing, Mr. Gwako for the Union stated that the issue in dispute is refusal to implement CBA. He stated that the Claimant had done all that can be done to discuss and that the matter had gone up to conciliation where Mr. Bacha was appointed by the Minister. He asserted the parties were invited to meetings and the Respondent refused to attend all the meetings and that the Conciliator issued report on 30th August 2023. The representative indicated that the Claimant accepted it and wrote asking the Respondent to accept the request and that despite several attempts to have this accepted the Respondent did not do anything.
5. He stated that in terms of section 59 of the Labour Relations Act 2007, the Respondent had failed, declined and/or refused to implement the 3 CBAs. He asserted that the refusal to implement the CBAs is illegal and violates Article 41 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. He asserted that the breach of the Constitution and legal provisions amounts to unfair labour practices and that the Respondent had contravened section 5 and 26 of the Employment Act as well as Article 27 of the Constitution. It was asserted this amounts to an offence.
6. The Claimant thus sought for judgement against the Respondent as follows:-a.Compel the Respondent to comply with RCA 284 of 2022 and RCA 285 of 2022. b.Accrued benefits accepted under CBAs be paid to employees concerned.c.Interest at 14% per annum per CBA effective dates till fully paid.d.Declaration the Respondent is in breach of Constitution Article 41 and Labour Relations Act 2007. e.Damages for the breach of constitutional rights.f.Costs and interest at court rates.g.Any other orders it deems fair, right and just.
7. The evidence adduced before the Court clearly demonstrates that the Respondent has declined to implement CBAs duly registered. The CBAs were before this Court as provided for under section 60 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007. The Claimant asserts refusal to implement the CBAs is a breach of the Employment Act, Labour Relations Act and the Constitution. The Court agrees. Section 59(5) of the Labour Relations Act states that a collective agreement becomes enforceable and shall be implemented upon registration by the court and shall be effective from the date agreed by the parties. The CBAs became effective upon registration by the Court in terms of sections 59(5) and 60 of the Act. This places an obligation on the Respondent to implement the CBAs and as failure to implement them is unconscionable, there will be sanctions.
8. Having failed to implement the CBAs, the Court finds in favour of the Claimant in this suit and grants the following prayers:-a.Declaration be and is hereby issued that the Respondent is in breach of Article 27 and 41 of the Constitution of Kenya and sections 59(5) and 60 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007. b.Respondent to comply with RCA 284 of 2022 and RCA 285 of 2022 forthwith.c.Accrued benefits accepted under CBAs be paid to employees concerned within 30 days of this decision.d.Interest on any accrued amounts that remain unpaid from 2nd May 2024 at 14% per annum till payment in full.e.Payment of Kshs. 500,000/- to the Claimant Union for the breach of the rights of the Claimant’s members.f.Interest at court rates on the sum in (e) above from the date of judgment till payment in full.g.Costs of the suit.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 3rd day of April 2024Nzioki wa MakauJUDGEPage 2 of 2