[2014] KEHC 5310 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 5310 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff, Kenya Commercial Bank Limited, remained the lawful chargee of the property CR No. 23231, Plot No. 3793/II/MN, as the loan secured by the charge had not been repaid and the charge had not been discharged. The registration of prohibitory and vesting orders, as well as the issuance...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 5310 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kenya Commercial Bank Limited; Defendant: Jeremy Willy Tsumah
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 59 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Plaintiff. All impugned registrations and provisional title declared null and void; original title reinstated; costs to Plaintiff.
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Land Charges, Prohibitory Orders, Vesting Orders, Provisional Title, Consent of Chargee
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Land Charges Prohibitory Orders Vesting Orders Provisional Title Consent of Chargee

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Commercial Bank Limited

Plaintiff

Jeremy Willy Tsumah

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the registration of prohibitory and vesting orders against the charged property without the chargee's consent is null and void.
  2. 2 Whether the issuance of a provisional Certificate of Title in respect of the charged property without the chargee's consent is valid.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the orders sought regarding the property and title.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff, Kenya Commercial Bank Limited, remained the lawful chargee of the property CR No. 23231, Plot No. 3793/II/MN, as the loan secured by the charge had not been repaid and the charge had not been discharged. The registration of prohibitory and vesting orders, as well as the issuance of a provisional Certificate of Title, were all effected without the Plaintiff's consent, in contravention of the Land Act and Land Registration Act. The law requires the chargee's consent for any disposition or dealing with charged property. As such, the court held that these registrations and the provisional title were null and void, ordered their cancellation, and reinstated...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Plaintiff. All impugned registrations and provisional title declared null and void; original title reinstated; costs to Plaintiff.

Orders

  • Registration of prohibitory order dated 25th May 2007 and vesting order dated 18th September 2007 against CR No. 23231, Plot No. 3793/II/MN declared null and void and set aside.
  • Provisional Certificate of Title dated 10th March 2009 in respect of CR No. 23231, Plot No. 3793/II/MN declared null and void and cancelled.