[2011] KEHC 3643 (KLR)
The court found that the Kiambu Law Courts lacked the requisite pecuniary jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit for recovery of Kshs.1,054,265.52 plus interest. The Principal Magistrate had already stayed the suit pending transfer, and the respondent had not opposed the application despite being duly served....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 3643 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.; Respondent: Catherine Njeri Angote
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 938 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
- Outcome
- application granted
- Judges
- CM Njagi
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suit, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Court Jurisdiction, Unopposed Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.
Applicant
Catherine Njeri Angote
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit should be transferred from Kiambu Law Courts to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi, Milimani Commercial Courts for hearing and final disposal.
- 2 Whether the Kiambu Law Courts have the requisite pecuniary jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit.
- 3 Whether the interests of justice require the transfer of the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Kiambu Law Courts lacked the requisite pecuniary jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit for recovery of Kshs.1,054,265.52 plus interest. The Principal Magistrate had already stayed the suit pending transfer, and the respondent had not opposed the application despite being duly served. In the interests of justice and to ensure expeditious disposal, the court held that the matter should be transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi, Milimani Commercial Courts, which has the proper jurisdiction. The court further found that the respondent would not be prejudiced by the transfer, as the current court could not proceed with the matter due to lack of...
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Kiambu SPMCC No.213 of 2009, Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd. v. Catherine Njeri Angote is transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi, Milimani Commercial Courts for hearing and final disposal.
- The file is to be placed before the Chief Magistrate at Milimani Commercial Courts on 10th March, 2011 for hearing directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL & TAX DIVISION – MILIMANI
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.938 OF 2010
KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. ………………… APPLICANT
VERSUS
CATHERINE NJERI ANGOTE ……………………… RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
By an application by Notice of Motion dated 30th September, 2010 and taken out under Sections 3A and 18 (1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Act and all other enabling provisions for the law, the Plaintiff/Applicant applies for orders that –
1. Kiambu SPMCC No.213 of 2009, Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd. v. Catherine Njeri Angote be transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi, Milimani Commercial Courts for hearing and final disposal.
2. The costs of this application be in the Cause.
The application is supported by the annexed affidavit of Wamaitha Kang’ethe, the Advocate having the conduct of this matter on behalf of the Applicant, and is based on the following grounds –
(a)That the suit was filed on 4th August, 2009 for recovery of a sum of Kshs.1,054,265. 52 together with interest at the rate of 16% p.a.
(b)On 20th May, 2010 the Honourable Mrs. D.A. Okundi, Principal Magistrate at the Kiambu Law Courts made an order staying the suit pending its transfer to a Court with proper jurisdiction.
(c)There is no Magistrate at the Kiambu Law Courts with proper jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit.
(d)It is in the interests of justice that the said suit be transferred for expeditious disposal of the same.
When this matter came for hearing before this Court, Mr. Mugalo held brief for Ms. Wamaitha but there was no appearance or representation for the Defendant. The record shows that the Defendant is represented by the firm of Kinoti & Kibe, Advocates and that they were duly served with the hearing notice for today, and that the service was effected on 17th December, 2010. That was about two months ago today and the Court was satisfied that they were served in sufficient time to attend Court. However, not only did they fail to attend Court, but they also failed to file any replying affidavit or grounds of opposition. In those circumstances, the Court found that the application was unopposed and that the Plaintiff was entitled to the orders prayed for.
In addition to the above, the application is obviously meritorious since there is no Magistrate with the requisite pecuniary jurisdiction at the Kiambu Law Courts and therefore it is in the interests of justice that the matter be transferred to a Court with that jurisdiction. The Defendant will not be prejudiced by the transfer in any way as the Court in which the matter now lies has no jurisdiction.
For the above reasons, I grant the orders as prayed and direct that –
(i)Kiambu SPMCC No.213 of 2009, KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. v. CATHERINE NJERI ANGOTE be and is hereby transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi, Milimani Commercial Courts for hearing and final disposal.
(ii)The file in respect thereof be placed before the Chief Magistrate at Milimani Commercial Courts on 10th March, 2011 for hearing directions.
(iii)Costs in the Cause.
It is so ordered.
DATEDand DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 18th day of February, 2011.
L. NJAGI
JUDGE