[2001] KEHC 861 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff's claim was supported by unchallenged affidavit evidence and documentary admission of the debt by the defendant. The defendant failed to file a replying affidavit or appear to contest the application, and the defence on record did not raise any triable issue. The court held that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KEHC 861 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.; Defendant: Data Stream Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 1077 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- summary judgment entered for the plaintiff
- Judges
- T Mbaluto
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Money Lending, Overdraft Liability, Unchallenged Affidavit Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.
Plaintiff
Data Stream Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for the sum claimed as due and owing from the defendant.
- 2 Whether the defence raises any triable issue to warrant a full trial.
- 3 Whether the defendant's allegation of illegal debit constitutes a valid defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff's claim was supported by unchallenged affidavit evidence and documentary admission of the debt by the defendant. The defendant failed to file a replying affidavit or appear to contest the application, and the defence on record did not raise any triable issue. The court held that the allegations of illegal debit were unrelated to the present claim and had been previously addressed. Consequently, the court determined that there was no genuine defence to the plaintiff's claim and summary judgment was appropriate.
Court Disposition
summary judgment entered for the plaintiff
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant as prayed in the plaint.
- The defendant shall bear the plaintiff's costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS
CIVIL CASE NO. 1077 OF 1996
KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. ………………….. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
DATA STREAM LIMITED ……………………………. DEFENDANT
RULING
This is an application for summary judgment under O. XXXV Rule 1, Order L Rule 1, 2, 3 and 15 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn on 23. 9.1999 by Stephen N. Mburu, the applicant’s Branch Manager at Kenyatta Avenue Branch. Though the application itself and a hearing notice relating thereto had been served upon the defendant/respondent, the defendant failed to file a replying affidavit and to turn up in court on 27. 2.2001 when the application was listed for hearing. In the event the application was heard ex parte.
The suit pursuant to which this application has been lodged is for the recovery of Shs.2,134,677/15 said to be due and owing by the defendant to the plaintiff on account of a money lent and/or overdraft allowed and money paid to the use of the defendant at his request plus interest thereon.
The defendant filed a defence to the suit on 28. 7.1997 through M/S Ochieng Oduol & Company Advocates who have since withdrawn, with leave of this court, from acting for the defendant. That defence apart from denying the plaintiff’s claim, avers that the defendant was guilty of making an illegal debit in its account.
The affidavit in support of the application reveals that the claim by the plaintiff against the defendant arises from a cheque in the sum of Shs.941,625/= issued by the defendant which said cheque was rejected by the collecting bank after the proceeds had been cleared by the plaintiff. In a letter dated 31. 10. 1994, a copy of which is annexed to Mr. Mburu’s affidavit, the defendant acknowledges the debt. Because of the admission, Mr. Mburu depones that the defendant’s denial of the debt is dishonest.
As to the averments of illegal debits alleged in the defence, Mr. Mburu depones that those matters transpired in 1993 prior to the events leading to this suit and had been exhaustively dealt with.
As aforesaid, no replying affidavit has been filed on behalf of the defendant to controvert what Mr. Mburu states in his affidavit and accordingly the evidence contained in that affidavit stands unchallenged.
That evidence establishes that the defendant is truly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum claimed in the plaint and that the defence filed herein does not raise any triable issue. Given those circumstances, this court has no option but to allow the application and to enter judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant as prayed in the plaint. It is so ordered. The defendant will bear the plaintiff’s costs of this application.
Dated at Nairobi this 9th day of March, 2001.
T. MBALUTO
JUDGE