[2002] KEHC 576 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 576 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant failed to file a replying affidavit or otherwise demonstrate any entitlement to defend the claim. The defence on record did not answer the plaintiff's claim, and the liability to pay arose from a contract to borrow money, the terms of which were agreed by both parties. The rate of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KEHC 576 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kenya Commercial Bank; Defendant: Bakari A. Yuwa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 313 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Summary Judgment
Outcome
application for summary judgment allowed with costs
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Contract Enforcement, Loan Agreements
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Contract Enforcement Loan Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Commercial Bank

Plaintiff

Bakari A. Yuwa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Summary Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment against the defendant for the claimed debt under the loan contract.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant has raised any triable issue or valid defence to the plaintiff's claim.
  3. 3 Whether the interest rate applied by the plaintiff bank was within the terms of the contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant failed to file a replying affidavit or otherwise demonstrate any entitlement to defend the claim. The defence on record did not answer the plaintiff's claim, and the liability to pay arose from a contract to borrow money, the terms of which were agreed by both parties. The rate of interest applied by the plaintiff bank was within the contract terms, and the bank had discretion to alter rates without notice. There being no triable issue or valid defence raised, the court allowed the application for summary judgment as prayed, with costs to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

application for summary judgment allowed with costs

Orders

  • Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff as prayed.
  • Defendant to pay costs of the application.