[2002] KECA 190 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 190 (KLR)

The Court found that the appeal was filed within the prescribed time limits, as the appellant's advocates received the necessary proceedings and ruling on 12th April, 2000, and the appeal was lodged on 8th June, 2000. The certificate of delay was not defective, as it accurately set out the relevant dates....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 190 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kenya Commercial Bank; Respondent: Charles Otiso Otundo
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 198 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
AB Shah
Legal Topics
Appeal Timelines, Certificate of Delay, Record of Appeal Requirements
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Timelines Certificate of Delay Record of Appeal Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Commercial Bank

Appellant

Charles Otiso Otundo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed out of time without leave.
  2. 2 Whether an essential step in the proceedings was omitted.
  3. 3 Whether the certificate of delay was defective.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the appeal was filed within the prescribed time limits, as the appellant's advocates received the necessary proceedings and ruling on 12th April, 2000, and the appeal was lodged on 8th June, 2000. The certificate of delay was not defective, as it accurately set out the relevant dates. Furthermore, there is no requirement under the applicable procedural rules to include the letter bespeaking copies of proceedings and ruling in the record of appeal when the certificate of delay addresses the issue. The application to strike out the appeal was therefore misconceived and without merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application to strike out the appeal is dismissed with costs.