[2021] KEELRC 2086 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 2086 (KLR)

The court found that there was no impediment to granting the applicant's prayer to merge the application with the main suit and proceed by way of documentation, as provided under Rule 21 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules, 2016. The court noted that all other prayers in the application had...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 2086 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Concrete, Structural, Ceramics, Tiles, Woodplys and Interior Design Workers Union; Respondent: Comply Industries Limited; Interested Party: Kenya Building Construction Timber & Furniture Employees Union
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E558 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application allowed in terms of prayer 5; main suit to proceed by way of documentation; status quo maintained.
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Procedure Under Elrc Rules, Status Quo Orders, Pre Trial Procedure, Covid19 Court Measures
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Procedure Under Elrc Rules Status Quo Orders Pre Trial Procedure Covid19 Court Measures

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Concrete, Structural, Ceramics, Tiles, Woodplys and Interior Design Workers Union

Applicant

Comply Industries Limited

Respondent

Kenya Building Construction Timber & Furniture Employees Union

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the application and main suit should be merged and proceed by way of documentation as per Rule 21 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules, 2016.
  2. 2 Whether there is any impediment to allowing the applicant to prosecute the main suit.
  3. 3 Whether status quo should be maintained pending determination of the main suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no impediment to granting the applicant's prayer to merge the application with the main suit and proceed by way of documentation, as provided under Rule 21 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules, 2016. The court noted that all other prayers in the application had already been granted or were spent, and the only remaining issue was to allow the main suit to proceed. The court further held that maintaining the status quo at the workplace was necessary pending the hearing and determination of the main suit, and directed the parties to conclude the filing of pleadings and obtain a mention date for pre-trial proceedings. The court also...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in terms of prayer 5; main suit to proceed by way of documentation; status quo maintained.

Orders

  • Status quo at the workplace to be maintained on matters raised in this suit pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
  • Parties to conclude filing of pleadings and obtain a mention date for pre-trial proceedings.