[2021] KEELRC 2086 (KLR)
The court found that there was no impediment to granting the applicant's prayer to merge the application with the main suit and proceed by way of documentation, as provided under Rule 21 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules, 2016. The court noted that all other prayers in the application had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELRC 2086 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Concrete, Structural, Ceramics, Tiles, Woodplys and Interior Design Workers Union; Respondent: Comply Industries Limited; Interested Party: Kenya Building Construction Timber & Furniture Employees Union
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E558 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed in terms of prayer 5; main suit to proceed by way of documentation; status quo maintained.
- Judges
- MN Nduma
- Legal Topics
- Procedure Under Elrc Rules, Status Quo Orders, Pre Trial Procedure, Covid19 Court Measures
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Concrete, Structural, Ceramics, Tiles, Woodplys and Interior Design Workers Union
Applicant
Comply Industries Limited
Respondent
Kenya Building Construction Timber & Furniture Employees Union
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application and main suit should be merged and proceed by way of documentation as per Rule 21 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules, 2016.
- 2 Whether there is any impediment to allowing the applicant to prosecute the main suit.
- 3 Whether status quo should be maintained pending determination of the main suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no impediment to granting the applicant's prayer to merge the application with the main suit and proceed by way of documentation, as provided under Rule 21 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules, 2016. The court noted that all other prayers in the application had already been granted or were spent, and the only remaining issue was to allow the main suit to proceed. The court further held that maintaining the status quo at the workplace was necessary pending the hearing and determination of the main suit, and directed the parties to conclude the filing of pleadings and obtain a mention date for pre-trial proceedings. The court also...
Court Disposition
Application allowed in terms of prayer 5; main suit to proceed by way of documentation; status quo maintained.
Orders
- Status quo at the workplace to be maintained on matters raised in this suit pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
- Parties to conclude filing of pleadings and obtain a mention date for pre-trial proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. E558 OF 2020
KENYA CONCRETE, STRUCTUAL, CERAMICS, TILES
WODDPLYS AND INTERIOR DESIGN
WORKERS UNION.....................................................................CLAIMANT/RESPONDENT
VERSUS
COMPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED…….…………………………………...RESPONDENT
AND
KENYA BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
TIMBER & FURNITURE EMPLOYEES UNION..............................INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
1. The notice of motion application dated 21/9/2020 seeks for an order in the following terms inter alia:-
1. Spent
2. Spent
3. Spent
4. Spent
5. That this application and the main suite be merged and proceed by way of documentation as provided for under Rule 21 of the Employment, and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules, 2016.
2. The application is premised on grounds set out on the Notice of Motion marked 1 to 34 and in the supporting affidavit of Dishon Angoya for the Applicant Union.
3. Prayers 1 to 3 were granted exparte by Radido, J. and on the return date on 18/11/2020, the Court granted prayer 4 the respondent having not filed any replying affidavit.
4. Prayers 1 to 4 having been spent the only prayer still alive is prayer 5 which seeks to dispense with the application and the parties to prosecute the main suit to deal with the substantive orders raised therein.
5 The Interested Party filed a replying affidavit dated 18/11/2020 and the respondent filed a replying affidavit pursuant to leave granted on 18/4/2020.
6. The Court has considered the deposition by the parties and the written submissions filed and find no impediment at all to the prayer by the applicant that the parties proceed to deal with the main suit so as to address the only outstanding substantive issues raised therein.
7. Indeed there is no prayer left in the application to address except that of allowing the wish of the dominis litis, the Claimant/Applicant to be allowed to prosecute the main suit.
8. Indeed, on 18/11/2020, the Court had already pre-empted the hearing of the application by granting prayer 4 thereof pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.
9. Accordingly, the Court grants prayer 5 of the application and makes the following Orders:-
(a) Status quo at the work place be maintained on matters raised in this suit pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
(b) Parties to conclude filing of pleadings and obtain a mention date for pre-trial proceedings.
(c) Costs in the cause.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 24th day of February, 2021.
MATHEWS N. NDUMA
JUDGE
ORDER
In view of the declaration of measures restricting court of operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in light of the directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice on 15th March 2020, this ruling has been delivered to the parties online with their consent. They have waived compliance with Order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court. In permitting this course, this court has been guided by Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution which requires the court to eschew undue technicalities in delivering justice, the right of access to justice guaranteed to every person under Article 48 of the Constitution and the provisions of Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act (chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya) which impose on this court the duty of the court, inter alia, to use suitable technology to enhance the overriding objective which is to facilitate just, expeditious, proportionate and affordable resolution of civil disputes.
MATHEWS N. NDUMA
JUDGE
Appearances
Mr. Angoya for Claimant
Mr. Masese for Respondent
Mr. Murage for Interested party
Ekale – Court clerk.