[2022] KEELRC 1556 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 1556 (KLR)

The court found that there was no consent on the issue of costs recorded by the parties, nor was any bill of costs filed or taxed. The application seeking endorsement of an alleged consent was therefore baseless. The court held that the application was an abuse of court process and a waste of judicial time,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 1556 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Council of Employment and Migrations Agencies; Respondent: Kenya Literature of Bureau; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary, Education Science and Technology; Respondent: Secretary, State Corporation Advisory Committee; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: Francis S. K. Baya; Interested Party: Belio Kipsang; Interested Party: Eve Akinyi Obara
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 35 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Petition / Ruling on Application for Endorsement of Consent on Costs
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the applicants
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Costs Award, Consent Orders, Abuse of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Costs Award Consent Orders Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Council of Employment and Migrations Agencies

Applicant

Kenya Literature of Bureau

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary, Education Science and Technology

Respondent

Secretary, State Corporation Advisory Committee

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Francis S. K. Baya

Interested Party

Belio Kipsang

Interested Party

Eve Akinyi Obara

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Petition / Ruling on Application for Endorsement of Consent on Costs

  1. 1 Whether there was a valid consent on the issue of costs recorded by the parties.
  2. 2 Whether the application to endorse the alleged consent on costs amounts to an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no consent on the issue of costs recorded by the parties, nor was any bill of costs filed or taxed. The application seeking endorsement of an alleged consent was therefore baseless. The court held that the application was an abuse of court process and a waste of judicial time, warranting its dismissal with costs to the applicants. The court further noted that the matter had already been disposed of by a ruling of the Deputy Registrar, and there was no basis for the application before it.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the applicants

Orders

  • The application dated November 11, 2021 is dismissed with costs to the applicants.