[2022] KEELRC 3776 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 3776 (KLR)

The court determined that justice would best be served by prioritizing the hearing of the substantive petition rather than granting or denying the interlocutory injunction outright. To preserve the substratum of the dispute and prevent prejudice to either party, the court ordered that the status quo be maintained...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 3776 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya County Workers Union; Respondent: Nairobi City County Government; Respondent: Nairobi City County Public Service Board
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E185 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Injunction Application Pending Hearing of Substantive Petition
Outcome
Status quo to be maintained pending judgment; parties to file written submissions; judgment scheduled for July 28, 2022.
Judges
K Ocharo
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Promotion of Public Employees, Return to Work Agreements, Status Quo Orders
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Injunctive Relief Promotion of Public Employees Return to Work Agreements Status Quo Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya County Workers Union

Applicant

Nairobi City County Government

Respondent

Nairobi City County Public Service Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Injunction Application Pending Hearing of Substantive Petition

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from recruiting new ECDE teachers before promoting existing qualified teachers as per the return to work formula.
  2. 2 Whether the status quo should be maintained pending the hearing and determination of the substantive petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that justice would best be served by prioritizing the hearing of the substantive petition rather than granting or denying the interlocutory injunction outright. To preserve the substratum of the dispute and prevent prejudice to either party, the court ordered that the status quo be maintained pending judgment on the petition. The court directed the parties to file and exchange written submissions within specified timelines and set a date for delivery of judgment. The decision was guided by the overriding objective of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act and constitutional principles requiring expeditious and proportionate resolution of disputes, as well as...

Court Disposition

Status quo to be maintained pending judgment; parties to file written submissions; judgment scheduled for July 28, 2022.

Orders

  • Parties to address the court on the substantive petition by way of written submissions.
  • Petitioner to file and serve submissions within 14 days.