[2021] KEELRC 747 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 747 (KLR)

The court determined that the only outstanding issue was the effective date of the CBA. It found that the Respondent had previously proposed 1st August 2019 as the effective date during negotiations, and there was no reasonable justification for the Respondent to later suggest different dates. The court held that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 747 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Engineering Workers Union; Respondent: Alloy Steel Casting Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 791 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed in part; effective date of CBA set by court.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Collective Bargaining Agreements, Effective Date of Cba, Employment Disputes
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Collective Bargaining Agreements Effective Date of Cba Employment Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Engineering Workers Union

Applicant

Alloy Steel Casting Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 What is the appropriate effective date for the incoming collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the only outstanding issue was the effective date of the CBA. It found that the Respondent had previously proposed 1st August 2019 as the effective date during negotiations, and there was no reasonable justification for the Respondent to later suggest different dates. The court held that adopting the date suggested by the Respondent in the meeting of 30th October 2019 was fair and consistent with the parties' negotiation history. The court also emphasized that CBA cycles cannot be suspended indefinitely due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and that the Respondent's shifting of proposed effective dates was unjustified. Accordingly, the court ordered that the effective...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part; effective date of CBA set by court.

Orders

  • Parties shall execute the CBA as agreed.
  • The effective date shall be 1st August 2019 as proposed by the Respondent, to run for a period of 2 years, and thereafter to remain in force until amended with the consent of the parties.