[2019] KEELRC 422 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 422 (KLR)

The court found that the parties, through conciliation, had agreed on the payment of the grievant’s final dues totaling Kshs.118,074, as detailed in the agreement dated 5th October 2018. The respondent did not contest the conciliator’s findings or the agreement, nor did either party file submissions objecting to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 422 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Engineering Workers Union; Respondent: Devki Steel Mills Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1055 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed
Judges
DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Terminal Dues, Gratuity Entitlement, Prorata Leave, Underpayment of Wages, House Allowance, Conciliation Process
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Terminal Dues Gratuity Entitlement Prorata Leave Underpayment of Wages House Allowance Conciliation Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Engineering Workers Union

Applicant

Devki Steel Mills Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to the terminal dues sought on behalf of the grievant.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent was contractually obligated to pay gratuity and other terminal benefits to the grievant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties, through conciliation, had agreed on the payment of the grievant’s final dues totaling Kshs.118,074, as detailed in the agreement dated 5th October 2018. The respondent did not contest the conciliator’s findings or the agreement, nor did either party file submissions objecting to the report. In the absence of any contest, the court adopted the conciliator’s recommendations and awarded the terminal dues as agreed. The court held that the claimant was entitled to the terminal dues sought on behalf of the grievant, and ordered payment of the specified amounts with interest from the date of judgment.

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the grievant Kshs.11,937 as notice.
  • The respondent shall pay the grievant Kshs.29,812 as service.