[2021] KEELRC 851 (KLR)
The court found that the Claimant failed to provide any evidence of employee membership to support its claim for union dues. Without such evidence, the claim for deduction of union dues could not be sustained. Similarly, the Claimant did not demonstrate that it had recruited a simple majority of the Respondent's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELRC 851 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Engineering Workers Union; Respondent: Esquire Wholesalers Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E271 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Judges
- L Ndolo
- Legal Topics
- Union Dues, Trade Union Recognition, Collective Bargaining, Employee Membership Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Engineering Workers Union
Applicant
Esquire Wholesalers Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent is obligated to deduct and remit union dues to the Claimant under Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to recognition by the Respondent for purposes of collective bargaining under Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act.
- 3 Whether the Respondent victimised employees on account of union membership.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Claimant failed to provide any evidence of employee membership to support its claim for union dues. Without such evidence, the claim for deduction of union dues could not be sustained. Similarly, the Claimant did not demonstrate that it had recruited a simple majority of the Respondent's unionisable employees, a prerequisite for recognition for collective bargaining. The allegation of victimisation was also unsupported by evidence. Consequently, the court dismissed the entire claim for lack of proof.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- The Claimant's claim as contained in the Memorandum of Claim and Chamber Summons dated 30th March 2021 is dismissed.
- Each party will bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO E271 OF 2021
KENYA ENGINEERING WORKERS UNION.........................CLAIMANT
VS
ESQUIRE WHOLESALERS LIMITED.................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1. On 1st April 2021, the Claimant Union filed a Memorandum of Claim together with a Chamber Summons dated 30th March 2021, seeking an order for deduction of union dues under Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act as well as recognition, for the purpose of collective bargaining, under Section 48 of the Act.
2. The Union accuses the Respondent of failure to deduct union dues from its employees.
3. The Claimant’s prayers are as follows:
a) An order directing the Respondent to deduct union dues;
b) An order restraining the Respondent from victimising the Claimant’s members on account of having joined the Union.
4. The Respondent filed a Reply on 30th April 2021 to which the Claimant responded on 16th June 2021. In its Reply, the Respondent states that the employees who the Claimant claims to have recruited as its members, had written letters indicating that they did not wish to have their salaries deducted on account of union dues.
5. The Respondent further states that it is not an engineering company and does not deal with engineering machines. The Respondent adds that it is engaged in wholesale and distribution business. The Respondent therefore maintains that the Claimant Union does not represent interests within its sector.
6. The matter was canvassed by way of written submissions.
7. There are two related issues for determination in this dispute; deduction of union dues and recognition for the purpose of collective bargaining.
8. Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act defines trade union dues as:
“a regular subscription required to be paid to a trade union by a member of the trade union as a condition of membership.”
9. By definition, trade union dues are premised on membership to a particular trade union. It follows therefore that a trade union claiming union dues from an employer must demonstrate evidence of membership of the employees on account of whom union dues are claimed.
10. In this case, the Claimant did not exhibit any such evidence and the claim for union dues is therefore without basis and is disallowed.
11. Regarding the issue of recognition, I will say this; under Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act, a trade union seeking recognition by an employer must show that it has recruited into its membership a simple majority of unionisable employees within the establishment. Again, the Claimant did not avail any evidence to show that it had indeed recruited a simple majority of the Respondent’s employees as its members.
12. The Claimant’s claim that its members were being victimised on account of their union membership was also unsupported.
13. On the whole, the Claimant did not adduce any evidence to supports its claim. The result is that the claim as contained in the Memorandum of Claim and Chamber Summons dated 30th March 2021 fails and is dismissed.
14. Each party will bear their own costs.
15. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 7TH DAY OCTOBER 2021
LINNET NDOLO
JUDGE
Appearance:
Mr. Araka (Union Representative) for the Claimant
Mr. Kaadee (HRM) for the Respondent