[2007] KEELRC 23 (KLR)

[2007] KEELRC 23 (KLR)

The Court determined that the central issue was whether the Union had a bona fide simple majority of unionisable employees, which would entitle it to recognition by the employer. Given the conflicting positions of the parties regarding the actual level of union membership, the Court found that the most fair and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEELRC 23 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Engineering Workers’ Union; Respondent: Hans Kenya Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 82 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Trade Dispute / Interim Award
Outcome
Interim award; secret ballot ordered to determine union majority before final decision.
Legal Topics
Recognition Agreement, Trade Union Membership, Collective Bargaining Rights
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Recognition Agreement Trade Union Membership Collective Bargaining Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Engineering Workers’ Union

Applicant

Hans Kenya Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Trade Dispute / Interim Award

  1. 1 Whether the employer's refusal to sign the recognition agreement was justified.
  2. 2 Whether the union has a bona fide simple majority among unionisable employees.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate method to determine the wishes of unionisable employees regarding union membership.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that the central issue was whether the Union had a bona fide simple majority of unionisable employees, which would entitle it to recognition by the employer. Given the conflicting positions of the parties regarding the actual level of union membership, the Court found that the most fair and objective method to resolve the dispute was to conduct a secret ballot among all unionisable employees (excluding casual workers), in the presence of representatives from both parties, the Court, and the Labour Office. The outcome of this ballot would conclusively establish whether the Union had the requisite majority for recognition. The Court therefore ordered that the secret...

Court Disposition

Interim award; secret ballot ordered to determine union majority before final decision.

Orders

  • A secret ballot shall be conducted among all unionisable employees (excluding casual workers) of the Company within one month to determine their wishes regarding union membership and whether the Union has a bona fide simple majority.
  • The secret ballot shall be conducted by Mr. Benson Okwayo of the Economic Planning Division, in the presence of representatives of both parties, the Registrar of the Court or his representative, and the Labour Officer, Industrial Area Office, or his/her representative.