[2018] KEELRC 1174 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent had already complied with the statutory minimum wage increase and that the union's demand for a 20% wage increase per year was excessive given the company's financial position and the reduction in unionisable staff. The court awarded a 7% general wage increase for each of the two...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1174 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Engineering Workers Union; Respondent: Nyanza Engineering and Hardware Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 210 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Economic Dispute / Judgment
- Outcome
- Partly allowed; wage and allowance increases granted in part, some claims declined.
- Judges
- MN Nduma
- Legal Topics
- Collective Bargaining Agreements, Wage Increase Disputes, Housing Allowance, Leave Travel Allowance, Safari Allowance, Effective Date of Cba
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Engineering Workers Union
Applicant
Nyanza Engineering and Hardware Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Economic Dispute / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the unionisable employees are entitled to a general wage increase for the period in dispute.
- 2 Whether the house allowance should be increased as proposed by the claimant.
- 3 Whether the leave travelling allowance should be reviewed upwards.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent had already complied with the statutory minimum wage increase and that the union's demand for a 20% wage increase per year was excessive given the company's financial position and the reduction in unionisable staff. The court awarded a 7% general wage increase for each of the two years, totaling 14%, as a fair compromise. The house allowance was increased to Kshs.2,700 or 15% of basic salary, whichever is higher, in line with CPI adjustments. The court declined to increase the leave travelling allowance due to the company's financial losses and the limited number of staff. The safari allowance rates were increased as proposed by the union, considering...
Court Disposition
Partly allowed; wage and allowance increases granted in part, some claims declined.
Orders
- No review of basic minimum wage.
- 7% general wage increase for the 1st year and 7% increase for the 2nd year, totaling 14%.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
54 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT KISUMU
CAUSE NO. 210 OF 2017
(Before Hon. Justice Mathews N. Nduma)
KENYA ENGINEERING WORKERS UNION....................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
NYANZA ENGINEERING AND HARDWARE LIMITED..........RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
1. This is an economic dispute and the issues in dispute are:-
a. Basic Minimum Wage.
b. General Wage Increase.
c. Housing Allowance.
d. Leave Travelling Allowance.
e. Safari Allowance.
f. Effective Date and duration.
2. The parties have a Recognition Agreement and registered Collective Bargaining agreement dated 16th September, 2011 to 1st May, 2013.
3. The Collective Bargaining Agreement in dispute is intended for the period May 2015 to May 2017.
4. The Claimant wrote a Memorandum of Demand to the Respondent. The Respondent made no counter offer on any of the items. A report of dispute was made to the Ministry of Labour. Hellen Maneno was appointed conciliator. The dispute was not resolved and was filed in court.
5. The Claimant has filed statement of claim which has been responded to by the Respondent. The CPMU, Ministry of Labour and Social Protection filed an economic report with the court on 9th February, 2018 analyzing the state of the Respondent vis a vis the demands made by the union.
6. The court has analyzed the evidence before court and has arrived at the following conclusion on the issues in dispute:-
(a) The Respondent has adjusted the basic minim wage bill upwards. The statutory rates were raised by 12% in the year 2015 General Wage order and the Respondent is already in conformity effective 1st May, 2015.
(b) General Wage increase.
7. The Claimant proposes general wage increase of 20% for the 1st year and 20% the 2nd year. This would result in total additional wage bill of Kshs.437,357. 28. The Respondent offers nil wage increase.
8. The cost of living as measured by the consumer price index (CPI) for the period of the CBA being 1st May 2013 to 1st May, 2015 for the County is 13. 75. Currently there are only 4 unionisable staff. Overall number of staff declined during the period under review. The unionisable labour cost for the 4 remaining staff is currently Kshs.1,075,812.
9. Going by the above and considering the submissions by the parties the court awards the unionsable employees 7% salary increase for the 1st year and 7% salary increase for the 2nd year making a total wage increase of 14%.
House Allowance
10. Guideline No.2(a)(ii) of 2005, provides for separate compensation for housing cost increases of up to ½ of the cost increase for the period at 7. 45%. Under the current CBA, employees are entitled to Kshs.2,500 housing allowance or 15% of the basic salary which ever is higher. The court awards Kshs.2,700 house allowance or 15% of the basic salary which ever is higher considering the 7. 45% CPI on housing.
Leave Travelling Allowance
11. The current CBA provides Kshs.2,300 for leave travelling allowance. The Claimants propose Kshs.2,500 for the first year and Kshs.3000 in the second year.
12. Most of the staff are within Kisumu County while others are largely from the larger Nyanza and Western Kenya .
13. Current expense on the item is Kshs.9,600 per year. The demand would raise the costs by Kshs.800 for the fist year and Ksahs.2,000 for the 2nd year. Given the current financial performance of the Respondent as depicted under Table 7 of the economic report, the company made some profit in the year 2014 and huge losses in the year 2015. The court makes no award on this items taking all factors into consideration.
Safari Allowances
14. The current CBA provides Kshs.150 for breakfast; Kshs.230 for lunch; Kshs.250 for dinner and Kshs.1,000 accommodation.
15. The Claimant proposes Kshs.150 for breakfast, Kshs.230 for lunch, Kshs.280 for dinner and Kshs.1,500 for accommodation. This is an occasional expense when an employee is on duty away from the place of work. Most of the expenses on this item are on transportation cost during the year under review.
The proposals by the union are reasonable and are awarded given the number of staff has considerably reduced.
Effective Date
16. The Claimants want a revision of the CBA for the two years period 1st May 2015 to 30th April 2017 to succeed the 2013/2015 registered CBA. The Respondent is pleading in ability to pay. Given the small number of unionsable staff left, and the requirement by the Recognition Agreement that Collective Bargaining Agreement be renewed every two years and taking into account the 12% minimum wage increase in the year 2015, the effective date of the new CBA would be 1st May 2016 to 30th April, 2018.
17. The final orders of the court are as follows:-
(i) No Review of basic minimum wage.
(ii) 7% General Wage increase for the 1st year and 7% increase for the 2nd year. Total 14%.
(iii) Kshs.2,700 house allowance or 15% of the basic salary which ever is higher.
(iv) Safari Allowance –
a) Kshs.170 for Breakfast.
b) Kshs.230 for lunch.
c) Kshs.280 for Dinner and
d) Kshs.1,500 for accommodation.
e) Effective date is 1st May, 2016.
Dated and Signed in Kisumu this 20th day of September, 2018
Mathews N. Nduma
Judge
Appearances
Mr. Araka for Claimant Union
Mr. Masake for Respondent
Chrispo – Court Clerk