[2018] KEELRC 1174 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1174 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent had already complied with the statutory minimum wage increase and that the union's demand for a 20% wage increase per year was excessive given the company's financial position and the reduction in unionisable staff. The court awarded a 7% general wage increase for each of the two...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1174 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Engineering Workers Union; Respondent: Nyanza Engineering and Hardware Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 210 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Economic Dispute / Judgment
Outcome
Partly allowed; wage and allowance increases granted in part, some claims declined.
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Collective Bargaining Agreements, Wage Increase Disputes, Housing Allowance, Leave Travel Allowance, Safari Allowance, Effective Date of Cba
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Collective Bargaining Agreements Wage Increase Disputes Housing Allowance Leave Travel Allowance Safari Allowance Effective Date of Cba

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Engineering Workers Union

Applicant

Nyanza Engineering and Hardware Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Economic Dispute / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the unionisable employees are entitled to a general wage increase for the period in dispute.
  2. 2 Whether the house allowance should be increased as proposed by the claimant.
  3. 3 Whether the leave travelling allowance should be reviewed upwards.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had already complied with the statutory minimum wage increase and that the union's demand for a 20% wage increase per year was excessive given the company's financial position and the reduction in unionisable staff. The court awarded a 7% general wage increase for each of the two years, totaling 14%, as a fair compromise. The house allowance was increased to Kshs.2,700 or 15% of basic salary, whichever is higher, in line with CPI adjustments. The court declined to increase the leave travelling allowance due to the company's financial losses and the limited number of staff. The safari allowance rates were increased as proposed by the union, considering...

Court Disposition

Partly allowed; wage and allowance increases granted in part, some claims declined.

Orders

  • No review of basic minimum wage.
  • 7% general wage increase for the 1st year and 7% increase for the 2nd year, totaling 14%.