[2017] KEELRC 1300 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1300 (KLR)

The court found that the interim orders sought by the claimant were, in substance, the same as the final reliefs that could be granted after a full hearing. Granting such orders at the interlocutory stage would effectively determine the substantive issues in dispute without the benefit of a full trial. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1300 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Engineering Workers Union; Respondent: Switchcraft Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 2519 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Interim Relief Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Interim Relief, Suspension of Employees, Union Dues Remittance, Trade Union Rights
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Interim Relief Suspension of Employees Union Dues Remittance Trade Union Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Engineering Workers Union

Applicant

Switchcraft Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Interim Relief Application

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to interim orders for payment of salaries to suspended employees pending the hearing of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be restrained from terminating or declaring redundant any grievant on grounds of trade union activities pending determination of the suit.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent should be compelled to remit union dues deducted from the shop steward for the past two years and comply with Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act 2007.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the interim orders sought by the claimant were, in substance, the same as the final reliefs that could be granted after a full hearing. Granting such orders at the interlocutory stage would effectively determine the substantive issues in dispute without the benefit of a full trial. The court held that interim relief is not appropriate where it would amount to granting the final orders sought in the main suit. Accordingly, the application for interim orders was dismissed, and the parties were directed to proceed to a hearing on the merits.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The claimant's application dated 7th December 2016 is dismissed.
  • Parties are directed to set down the suit for hearing on the merits.