[2018] KECA 390 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 390 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that there was no valid Notice of Appeal lodged against the ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court made on 21st March 2013. Without such a notice, the Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Furthermore, the appellant Union's standing was in question as its members...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KECA 390 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kenya Game Hunting & Safaris Workers Union; Respondent: Southern Cross Safaris
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 143 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Judges
AM Githinji, GG Okwengu, S ole Kantai
Legal Topics
Union Membership Disputes, Locus Standi, Notice of Appeal Requirements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Union Membership Disputes Locus Standi Notice of Appeal Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Game Hunting & Safaris Workers Union

Appellant

Southern Cross Safaris

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there was a valid Notice of Appeal lodged against the ruling of 21st March 2013.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant Union had locus standi to represent members who had left the Union.
  3. 3 Whether the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that there was no valid Notice of Appeal lodged against the ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court made on 21st March 2013. Without such a notice, the Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Furthermore, the appellant Union's standing was in question as its members had left, casting doubt on its ability to represent any members. The absence of jurisdiction was dispositive, and the appeal was struck out accordingly.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.