[2025] KEELRC 366 (KLR)

[2025] KEELRC 366 (KLR)

The court held that the power granted to trade unions to sue on behalf of their members in the Employment and Labour Relations Court is a special statutory power that cannot be transferred to any other person, including an advocate or the member acting in person. The court further found that the application sought...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELRC 366 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union; Applicant: Agnes Wanjiru Evan; Respondent: Boma Hotel/Red Court Hotel
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1051 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Application for Joinder and Change of Representation
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Trade Union Representation, Joinder of Parties, Right to Counsel, Res Judicata
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Trade Union Representation Joinder of Parties Right to Counsel Res Judicata

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union

Applicant

Agnes Wanjiru Evan

Applicant

Boma Hotel/Red Court Hotel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Application for Joinder and Change of Representation

  1. 1 Whether Agnes Wanjiru Evan can be joined as a 2nd Claimant in the proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union can be barred from representing Agnes Wanjiru Evan after withdrawal of instructions.
  3. 3 Whether the application is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the power granted to trade unions to sue on behalf of their members in the Employment and Labour Relations Court is a special statutory power that cannot be transferred to any other person, including an advocate or the member acting in person. The court further found that the application sought to revisit an issue already conclusively determined in a previous ruling, thereby offending the doctrine of res judicata and the rule against a court sitting on appeal over its own decisions. Consequently, the application was found to be without merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 18th June 2024 is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.