[2017] KEELRC 420 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 420 (KLR)

The court found that since the Court of Appeal had granted a stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the respondent's appeal, it would be improper to grant any enforcement orders sought by the union. The outcome of the appeal would directly impact the enforceability of the judgment, and as such,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 420 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union; Respondent: Great Rift Valley Lodge & Golf Resort/Green Park Golf & Country Complex; Interested Party: Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Education Institutions, Hospitals & Allied Workers
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 377 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Labour Cause / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement and Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for enforcement orders declined due to subsisting stay of execution by the Court of Appeal.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Union Recognition, Stay of Execution, Enforcement of Judgment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Union Recognition Stay of Execution Enforcement of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union

Applicant

Great Rift Valley Lodge & Golf Resort/Green Park Golf & Country Complex

Respondent

Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Education Institutions, Hospitals & Allied Workers

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Labour Cause / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement and Stay Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant enforcement orders against the respondent pending the outcome of the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the stay of execution granted by the Court of Appeal precludes further enforcement action by the union.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the Court of Appeal had granted a stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the respondent's appeal, it would be improper to grant any enforcement orders sought by the union. The outcome of the appeal would directly impact the enforceability of the judgment, and as such, the court declined to issue show cause or warrants of arrest against the respondent's management. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

Application for enforcement orders declined due to subsisting stay of execution by the Court of Appeal.

Orders

  • No enforcement orders granted against the respondent pending the outcome of the appeal.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.