[2006] KEELRC 12 (KLR)
The court found that the amended order for a secret ballot to determine the union membership preferences of unionisable employees does not contravene the Trade Disputes Act or Section 80 of the Constitution. Instead, the order is designed to foster industrial peace and resolve the rivalry between unions seeking...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEELRC 12 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers’ Union; Respondent: Southern Palms Beach Resort; Interested Party: Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions, Hospitals & Allied Workers
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 120 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Cause / Interpretation of Amended Order
- Outcome
- Application for interpretation of the amended order is rejected as untenable and devoid of merit.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Union Recognition, Secret Ballot Procedure, Union Membership Determination
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers’ Union
Applicant
Southern Palms Beach Resort
Respondent
Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions, Hospitals & Allied Workers
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Industrial Cause / Interpretation of Amended Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the amended order directing a secret ballot to determine union membership contravenes the Trade Disputes Act or the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the order adversely affects the business operations of the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the amended order for a secret ballot to determine the union membership preferences of unionisable employees does not contravene the Trade Disputes Act or Section 80 of the Constitution. Instead, the order is designed to foster industrial peace and resolve the rivalry between unions seeking recognition at the Resort. The application for interpretation was therefore dismissed as lacking merit, and the court directed that the secret ballot exercise proceed as previously ordered.
Court Disposition
Application for interpretation of the amended order is rejected as untenable and devoid of merit.
Orders
- Mr. Benson Okwayo is directed to proceed with the secret ballot exercise forthwith as per the amended order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI.
(Before: Charles P. Chemmuttut, J.,
O.A. Wafula & J.M. Kilonzo, Members.)
CAUSE NO. 120 OF 2005.
(In the matter of an amended order arising from the award
of Murtaza Jaffer, J., P.M. Osero & J.G. Ngolo, Members.)
KENYA HOTELS & ALLIED WORKERS’UNION...................................................Claimants
v.
SOUTHERN PALMS BEACH RESORT ...........................................................Respondents.
and
KENYA UNION OF DOMESTIC, HOTELS,EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS,
HOSPITALS& ALLIED WORKERS........................................................... Interested Party.
Issue in Dispute:-
“Refusal to sign Recognition Agreement”.
No appearance for the Claimants (hereinafter called the first Union).
No appearance for the Respondents (hereinafter called the Resort).
No appearance for the Interested Party (hereinafter called the second
Union).
INTERPRETATION OF THE AMENDED ORDER.
On 13th July, 2006, the Court made the following amended ormodified order to the award in this matter, dated 16th December,
2005:-
“With the foregoing discussion in view, the Court deems it fit orproper to find out the exact and true wishes of the unionisableemployees regarding their union membership; and the bestway to do this is by giving the unionisable employees anotheropportunity to express their wishes through a secret ballot. Accordingly, the Court directs Mr. Benson Okwayo of the EPD to repeat the exercise and find out through a secret ballot and with reasonable access to the unionisable employees (excluding seasonal and casual workers) and in the presence of both parties’ representatives, the Registrar of this Court or his representative and the Provincial Labour Officer or his representative, to which of the two trade unions the majority of the unionisable employees wish to belong. The exercise should be completed within one month from the date of this amended or modified order, and the Court will make its final decision immediately on receipt of the results of the secret ballot.”
This application for interpretation of the amended order in Form “F”, under Section 16(5) of the Trade Disputes Act, Cap. 234, Laws of Kenya (which is hereinafter referred to as the Act), was presented to the Court by Mr. Salim wa Mwawaza, Executive Officer, F.K.E., for the Resort on 7th August, 2006, accompanied by a memorandum in support thereof. In the said memorandum, Mr. Mwawaza is seeking interpretation of the amended order mainly on the following grounds:-
(i)That the award (order) is in conflict and violates Sections 5(2), 16(6) and 17(1) and (2) of the Act.
(ii)That the order is in conflict with Section 80 of the Constitution.
(iii)That the order will adversely affect the business operations of the Resort in both finance and publicity.
On careful reading of the memorandum in support of the application for interpretation and the annexures thereto, we are of the considered opinion that the amended order is not in contravention of the provisions of the Act and Section 80 of the Constitution; but, on the contrary, the amended order will in fact foster industrial peace and harmony in the Resort and bring or put to an end unions’ rivalry for recognition. In the circumstances, the application for interpretation of the amendend order is rejected summarily as untenable and devoid of merit.
Mr. Benson Okwayo is directed to proceed with the exercise forthwith.
DATED and given in Nairobi this 10th day of August, 2006.
Charles P. Chemmuttut, MBS.,
JUDGE.
O.A. Wafula,J.M. Kilonzo,
MEMBER.MEMBER.