[2018] KEELRC 867 (KLR)
The court found that the respondents, except for the 6th respondent, unlawfully deducted 16% VAT from employees' service charge and failed to comply with court orders to provide records of such deductions. The court accepted the claimant's quantified claims, as the respondents did not challenge or rebut the evidence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 867 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union; Respondent: The Panari Hotel; Respondent: The Jacaranda Hotel; Respondent: The Sunset Hotel; Respondent: Southern Sun Hotel; Respondent: Siana Springs Hotel; Respondent: The Fairmont Group of Hotels; Respondent: Serena Group of Hotels; Respondent: The Safari Park Hotel; Respondent: The Boma Hotel; Respondent: Suna Africa Hotel; Respondent: Nairobi Hilton Hotel; Interested Party: KUDHEIHA Workers; Interested Party: Kenya Hotel Keepers and Caterers Association
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1081 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment and Labour Cause / Post Judgment Application for Enforcement of Orders and Quantification of Unlawful Deductions
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the claimant against the specified respondents for quantified unlawful VAT deductions; application allowed as against non-compliant respondents.
- Judges
- DO Ogal
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Deductions, Employee Remuneration, Service Charge, Value Added Tax, Employer Obligations
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union
Claimant
The Panari Hotel
Respondent
The Jacaranda Hotel
Respondent
The Sunset Hotel
Respondent
Southern Sun Hotel
Respondent
Siana Springs Hotel
Respondent
The Fairmont Group of Hotels
Respondent
Serena Group of Hotels
Respondent
The Safari Park Hotel
Respondent
The Boma Hotel
Respondent
Suna Africa Hotel
Respondent
Nairobi Hilton Hotel
Respondent
KUDHEIHA Workers
Interested Party
Kenya Hotel Keepers and Caterers Association
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Cause / Post Judgment Application for Enforcement of Orders and Quantification of Unlawful Deductions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents unlawfully deducted 16% VAT from employees' service charge.
- 2 Whether the respondents are obligated to provide records of VAT deductions to the claimant.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to recover the unlawfully deducted amounts on behalf of aggrieved employees.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents, except for the 6th respondent, unlawfully deducted 16% VAT from employees' service charge and failed to comply with court orders to provide records of such deductions. The court accepted the claimant's quantified claims, as the respondents did not challenge or rebut the evidence presented. Judgment was therefore entered in favour of the aggrieved employees for the specific amounts claimed against each non-compliant respondent. The 6th respondent was exonerated, having demonstrated it did not make such deductions.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the claimant against the specified respondents for quantified unlawful VAT deductions; application allowed as against non-compliant respondents.
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favour of the aggrieved employees against Panari Hotel for Kshs.10,492,572.96.
- Judgment is entered in favour of the aggrieved employees against The Jacaranda Hotel for Kshs.19,422,764.74.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
50 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1081 OF 2015
CONSOLIDATED WITH CAUSE NO. 1986 OF 2016
(Before Hon. Lady Justice Maureen Onyango)
KENYA HOTELS AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION........................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
THE PANARI HOTEL....................................................................1ST RESPONDENT
THE JACARANDA HOTEL.........................................................2ND RESPONDENT
THE SUNSET HOTEL...................................................................3RD RESPONDENT
SOUTHERN SUN HOTEL............................................................4TH RESPONDENT
SIANA SPRINGS HOTEL.............................................................5TH RESPONDENT
THE FAIRMONT GROUP OF HOTELS....................................6TH RESPONDENT
SERENA GROUP OF HOTELS...................................................7TH RESPONDENT
THE SAFARI PARK HOTEL........................................................8TH RESPONDENT
THE BOMA HOTEL......................................................................9TH RESPONDENT
SUNA AFRICA HOTEL..............................................................10TH RESPONDENT
NAIROBI HILTON HOTEL.......................................................11TH RESPONDENT
AND
KUDHEIHA WORKERS..................................................1ST INTERESTED PARTY
KENYA HOTEL KEEPERS AND
CATERERS ASSOCIATION............................................2ND INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
Judgment in this case was delivered by Ndolo J. on 27th January 2017.
The court ordered as follows –
1. “The Court was therefore unable to understand under what circumstances an employer would recover VAT from its employees.
2. Consequently, the Court finds the Respondents' action of recovering VAT from its employees not only unlawful but also unreasonable and directs that any such charges must stop forthwith.
3. I however withhold my decision on the prayer for recovery of past charges pending filing of particulars by the aggrieved employees.
4. I direct that each party will bear its own costs.”
Pursuant to the said orders, the successful claimant filed the application dated 19th April 2017 seeking the following orders –
1. That the court be pleased to order the 3rd, 5th to the 11th respondent and two members of the 2nd Interested Party to avail the record for the 16% VAT on their employees service charge to the applicant within seven days for the period they unlawfully levied.
2. That the costs of this application be paid by the above mentioned respondents in paragraph one.
The grounds for filing the application is that the applicant engaged all the respondents to avail and ascertain the records of the unlawful deductions of 16% VAT on employees service charge but the 3rd, 5th to 11th respondents, Golden Jubilee Limited T/A Crown Plaza Hotel, Azuri Limited T/A Royal Orchid Hotel, members of the 2nd Interested Party declined to provide the records.
Upon the failure of the respondents to avail the records, the claimant applied its own resources to source for the information which it filed in court as follows –
Nairobi Serena Individual VAT claim............... Kshs.9,898,126. 84
Panari Hotel....................................................... Kshs.10,492,572. 96
Southern Sun Mayfair Nairobi.......................... Kshs.15,191,105. 26
The Jacaranda Hotel......................................... Kshs.19,422,764. 74
Only the 6th respondent responded to the application by filing both a replying affidavit of MBITHE WAMBUA, its Group Director, Talent and Culture and written submission. I am satisfied from the said affidavit and submissions that the 6th respondent Fairmount Group of Hotels does not charge VAT on service charge as demonstrated in the sample payslips annexed to the replying affidavit.
All the other hotels have failed to submit their records or to comment on the records filed by the claimant pursuant to the orders of the court, which permitted the claimant to file particulars of claims by the aggrieved employees.
I therefore enter judgment in favour of the aggrieved employees against the respondents as follows –
1. Panari Hotel.................................................. Kshs.10,492,572. 96
2. The Jacaranda Hotel..................................... Kshs.19,422,764. 74
3. Southern Sun Mayfair Nairobi..................... Kshs.15,191,105. 26
4. Nairobi Serena Individual VAT claim.......... Kshs.9,898,126. 84
The details are as particularised in the records submitted by the claimant.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018
MAUREEN ONYANGO
JUDGE