[2021] KEELC 3325 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3325 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant's failure to comply with the timelines for filing submissions was occasioned by the abrupt closure of the Court Registry due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court recognized that the appellant still had five days to comply when the closure was ordered, and that the circumstances were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 3325 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Medical Association; Respondent: Machiri Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 6 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal reinstated; directions given for filing of submissions.
Judges
BM Eboso
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Appeal, Non Compliance With Timelines, Court Discretion, Covid 19 Court Closure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Reinstatement of Appeal Non Compliance With Timelines Court Discretion Covid 19 Court Closure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Medical Association

Applicant

Machiri Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be reinstated after dismissal for non-compliance with court timelines.
  2. 2 Whether the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant court closure constitute sufficient cause for non-compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant's failure to comply with the timelines for filing submissions was occasioned by the abrupt closure of the Court Registry due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court recognized that the appellant still had five days to comply when the closure was ordered, and that the circumstances were beyond the appellant's control. Exercising its discretion, the court held that sufficient cause had been demonstrated and reinstated the appeal, admitting the appellant's submissions and granting the respondent time to respond.

Court Disposition

Appeal reinstated; directions given for filing of submissions.

Orders

  • The appeal is reinstated.
  • The appellant's written submissions are admitted.