[2021] KEHC 3351 (KLR)
The court found that since the appellant's appeal had been allowed and the lower court's judgment set aside, the appellant was entitled to the release of the security deposited pending appeal. The respondent had not prosecuted any further appeal, and both parties did not oppose the applications. The court further...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 3351 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Kenya Medical Research Institute; Respondent: Winnie Nyakio Wainaina (Suing as a widow and personal representative of George Wanaina Ngugi, Deceased)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 72 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Applications for Release of Security and Change of Advocates
- Outcome
- Both applications allowed.
- Judges
- JK Sergon
- Legal Topics
- Release of Security, Change of Advocates, Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Medical Research Institute
Appellant
Winnie Nyakio Wainaina (Suing as a widow and personal representative of George Wanaina Ngugi, Deceased)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Applications for Release of Security and Change of Advocates
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order the release of the monies held as security pending appeal to the successful party.
- 2 Whether the signatory representing the firm of Ngetich Chiira & Associates should be allowed to solely sign for the release of funds due to the incapacity of the other signatory.
- 3 Whether the firm of Messrs Njeru, Nyaga & Co. Advocates LLP should be placed on record for the respondent in place of Messrs Njogu & Ngugi Advocates.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since the appellant's appeal had been allowed and the lower court's judgment set aside, the appellant was entitled to the release of the security deposited pending appeal. The respondent had not prosecuted any further appeal, and both parties did not oppose the applications. The court further held that due to the incapacity of one signatory, it was just to allow the remaining signatory to effect the release of funds. Additionally, the respondent was entitled to change advocates post-judgment, and the application to place the new firm on record was allowed. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.
Court Disposition
Both applications allowed.
Orders
- An order is made for the release of Kshs. 5,848,228 plus interest to the respondent held as security by NCBA Bank in the joint names of Njogu and Ngugi and Ngetich, Chiira and Associates.
- The signatory representing the law firm of Ngetich Chiira & Associates to solely sign for purposes of releasing the funds from the bank.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2018
KENYA MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE.................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
WINNIE NYAKIO WAINAINA
(Suing as awidow and personal representative of
GEORGEWANAINA NGUGI (Deceased).......................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This is a ruling on two applications. The first is the motion dated 7th June 021 in which the appellant sought for the following orders:
a) Spent
b) That this honorable court be pleased to order the release of the monies held as security pending appeal of Kshs. 5,848,220 plus interest accrued thereon held in the jint names of Njogu and Ngugi and Ngetich, Chiira and associates for onward transmission to the applicant.
c) That the order be issued allowing the signatory representing the firm of Ngetich Chiira and Associates to sign solely for purposes of releasing the funds from the bank.
d) That the costs of this application be provided for.
2. The application is based on the grounds set out on the motionand is supported by the affidavit sworn by Magdaline C. Ngetich. The deponent of the supporting affidavit averred that the appellant filed this appeal and that prior to the hearing and determination of the appeal, this court made a conditional order of stay of execution of the judgement and decree of the lower court and further directed the appellant to deposit in a joint account the decretal sum of Kshs. 5,848,228 plus costs which was done.
3. She further deponed that the appeal was thereafter heard anddetermined on 13/11/2020 in which this court allowed the appellants’ appeal and set aside the judgement of the lower court in CMCC 5818.
4. It is also averred that the respondent lodged and filed a Notice of Appeal on 6/11/2020 against the judgement but never prosecuted the Appeal.
5. In response to a letter dated 25/2/2021 counsel for the respondent assented to the release of the money from the account held between Njogu and Ngugi advocates and Ngetich Chiira and Associates at NCBA to the appellant’s advocates firm save for the fact that she indicated that she was incapacitated as a result of an injury.
6. It is therefore necessary to make this application in order to allow the 2nd signatory to the account Ms. Magdaline Cherotich Ngetich counsel for the applicant to be allowed to transfer the funds to the firm without requiring the signature of the 1st signatory.
7. The second application is dated 1/7/2021 and filed by the respondent whereof the respondent sought for the firm of Messrs Njeru,Nyaga & Co. Adocates LLP to be placed on the record for the respondent in place of Messrs Njogu& Ngugi Advocates.
8. The application is supported by the affidavit of Martin Njeru Nyaga who deponed that sometimes in December 2020 the respondent instructed him to take over the matter after judgement had been rendered. The respondent indicated that the advocate that was appointed by her husband was not keen on appraising her over the matter.
9. On examination of the record this court notes that the applications herein were not opposed by either party. This court also notes that on 13/11/2020 the court allowed the appellant’s appeal and set aside the judgement of the lower court. However, the respondent has indicated that since then, the monies held in the joint interest earning account has not been released to the respondent due to the fact that counsel for the appellant has been incapacitated due to an injury.
10. Indeed, the appellant has a right to the fruits of the judgement delivered. In light of the above, this court finds no reason not to allow both applications and therefore I make the following orders;
i. An order is made for the release of Kshs. 5,848,228 plus interest to the respondent held as security by NCBA Bank in the joint names of Njogu and Ngugi and Ngetich, Chiira and Associates, the NCBA bank.
ii. The signatory representing the law firm of Ngetich Chiira & Associates to solely sign for purposes of releasing the funds from the bank.
iii. The firm of Messrs Njeru, Nyaga & Co. Adocates LLP is now placed on record for the respondent in place of the firm of Messrs Njogu & Ngugi Advocates.
iv. Each party to bear its own costs.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ONLINE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI THIS 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021.
.........................
J. K. SERGON
JUDGE
In the presence of:
...................................... for the Appellant
.................................. for the Respondent