[2018] KEELRC 2131 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2131 (KLR)

The court found that the preliminary objection and the application by the 1st respondent did not raise pure points of law but instead required the determination of contested facts, specifically the identity of the petitioners' employer. The court held that a preliminary objection cannot be sustained where factual...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2131 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya National Farmers Federation (Suing through its Registered Officials Namely Hon. Nduati Kariuki (Chairman), Prof Kaburu M’Ribu (Secretary) and Grace Ngambi (Treasurer)) and 23 others; Applicant: George Nyamu; Applicant: Benard M. Mulandi; Applicant: Collins Odhiambo Ondiek; Applicant: Dorcas Atieno Wambia; Applicant: Mugambi Edward Nkubiri; Applicant: Faith Nzese Maithya; Applicant: Ben Rono; Applicant: Gilbert Kipkorir Tanui; Applicant: Isaac Thuranira; Applicant: John Okari Okioga; Applicant: Kelvin Murithi Njeru; Applicant: Laban Kaara Mwaniki; Applicant: Misheck Kiogora; Applicant: Nancy Ntinyari Mwongela; Applicant: Pervince Onyango Ogutu; Applicant: Peter Kaheni; Applicant: Peter Mwangi Gakuu; Applicant: Philips Owiti Minudi; Applicant: Roda Mbandi Kilonzi; Applicant: Robert Kamau; Applicant: Rose Kambura Njilu; Applicant: Tom Ochieng; Applicant: Mutava Xavier Masila; Respondent: Humanist Institute for Co-operation with Developing Countries (HIVOS); Respondent: SNV Netherlands Development Organization in Kenya
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 27 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Jurisdictional Application
Outcome
preliminary objection and application dismissed; matter to proceed to hearing on merits
Judges
MN Nduma, DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Employment Court, Employer Employee Relationship, Preliminary Objection, Terminal Benefits Liability
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Jurisdiction of Employment Court Employer Employee Relationship Preliminary Objection Terminal Benefits Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Farmers Federation (Suing through its Registered Officials Namely Hon. Nduati Kariuki (Chairman), Prof Kaburu M’Ribu (Secretary) and Grace Ngambi (Treasurer)) and 23 others

Applicant

George Nyamu

Applicant

Benard M. Mulandi

Applicant

Collins Odhiambo Ondiek

Applicant

Dorcas Atieno Wambia

Applicant

Mugambi Edward Nkubiri

Applicant

Faith Nzese Maithya

Applicant

Ben Rono

Applicant

Gilbert Kipkorir Tanui

Applicant

Isaac Thuranira

Applicant

John Okari Okioga

Applicant

Kelvin Murithi Njeru

Applicant

Laban Kaara Mwaniki

Applicant

Misheck Kiogora

Applicant

Nancy Ntinyari Mwongela

Applicant

Pervince Onyango Ogutu

Applicant

Peter Kaheni

Applicant

Peter Mwangi Gakuu

Applicant

Philips Owiti Minudi

Applicant

Roda Mbandi Kilonzi

Applicant

Robert Kamau

Applicant

Rose Kambura Njilu

Applicant

Tom Ochieng

Applicant

Mutava Xavier Masila

Applicant

Humanist Institute for Co-operation with Developing Countries (HIVOS)

Respondent

SNV Netherlands Development Organization in Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Jurisdictional Application

  1. 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has jurisdiction to hear the petitioners' claim against the respondents.
  2. 2 Whether there exists an employer-employee relationship between the petitioners and the 1st respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the preliminary objection and application raise pure points of law suitable for summary determination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the preliminary objection and the application by the 1st respondent did not raise pure points of law but instead required the determination of contested facts, specifically the identity of the petitioners' employer. The court held that a preliminary objection cannot be sustained where factual issues must be resolved, as established in the Mukhisa Biscuits case. Consequently, the court dismissed both the preliminary objection and the application, directing the parties to proceed before the Principal Judge for expeditious disposal of the substantive petition.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection and application dismissed; matter to proceed to hearing on merits

Orders

  • The preliminary objection filed by the 1st respondent is dismissed.
  • The application dated 17th May, 2017 by the 1st respondent is dismissed.