[2017] KEELRC 1493 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1493 (KLR)

The Court found that the Claimant failed to take any steps to progress the Cause for over two years, did not provide evidence of service of Summons, and failed to attend the scheduled hearing on 4 April 2017. These failures amounted to inordinate delay and lack of prosecution. In the absence of any explanation or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1493 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: Bedrock Holding Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1555 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Cause dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Service of Summons, Hearing Nonattendance
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Service of Summons Hearing Nonattendance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Applicant

Bedrock Holding Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the Cause should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inaction by the Claimant.
  2. 2 Whether there was proper service of Summons on the Respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant's absence at the scheduled hearing warrants dismissal of the Cause.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the Claimant failed to take any steps to progress the Cause for over two years, did not provide evidence of service of Summons, and failed to attend the scheduled hearing on 4 April 2017. These failures amounted to inordinate delay and lack of prosecution. In the absence of any explanation or attendance by the Claimant, and with no evidence of service on the Respondent, the Court exercised its discretion to dismiss the Cause for want of prosecution. The dismissal was made without an order as to costs, considering the circumstances and the absence of both parties at the hearing.

Court Disposition

Cause dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The Cause is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • There shall be no order as to costs.