[2017] KEELRC 1543 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1543 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had failed to take any steps to progress the cause for over two years and did not attend court in response to the notice to show cause. The respondent also failed to attend. The court held that the inordinate delay and lack of action by the claimant justified dismissal of the suit...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1543 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: Collindale Security Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 2180 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal
Outcome
cause dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Union Recognition, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Union Recognition Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Claimant

Collindale Security Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant made any attempt to progress the cause within the required period.
  3. 3 Whether there is justification for non-attendance by the parties in response to the notice to show cause.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had failed to take any steps to progress the cause for over two years and did not attend court in response to the notice to show cause. The respondent also failed to attend. The court held that the inordinate delay and lack of action by the claimant justified dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution. There was no justification provided for the non-attendance or the delay. Accordingly, the cause was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

cause dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The cause is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • There is no order as to costs.