[2015] KEELRC 133 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 133 (KLR)

The court found that the orders sought in the application mirrored the substantive prayers in the main claim. Granting such orders at the interlocutory stage would effectively determine the main suit without a full hearing, which is contrary to established legal principles. The court held that the application was an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 133 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: Eveready Security Guards Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1970 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Union Membership Rights, Statutory Deductions, Employee Document Retention, Victimisation of Union Members
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Union Membership Rights Statutory Deductions Employee Document Retention Victimisation of Union Members

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Applicant

Eveready Security Guards Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent should be restrained from victimising, harassing, or dismissing union members pending determination of the main claim.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent should be compelled to release employees' original documents and effect statutory deductions and payslips.
  3. 3 Whether granting the interlocutory orders would amount to determining the main claim at an interim stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the orders sought in the application mirrored the substantive prayers in the main claim. Granting such orders at the interlocutory stage would effectively determine the main suit without a full hearing, which is contrary to established legal principles. The court held that the application was an abuse of the court process and dismissed it, allowing the Claimant to proceed to hearing of the main claim on a priority basis.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Claimant's application dated 5th November 2015 is dismissed as an abuse of the court process.
  • There shall be no order as to costs.