[2022] KEELRC 622 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 622 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimant had established a prima facie case that the Respondent failed to effect the remittance of union dues as required by law and had victimized union members. The Respondent's failure to file a response or defence meant the Claimant's evidence was unchallenged. The court applied Article...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 622 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: Gyto Security Services Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1020 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed. Orders granted as prayed.
Judges
AN Mwaure
Legal Topics
Trade Union Membership, Union Dues Deduction, Victimization of Union Members, Check Off System, Employee Rights, Remedies for Labour Disputes
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Trade Union Membership Union Dues Deduction Victimization of Union Members Check Off System Employee Rights Remedies for Labour Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Applicant

Gyto Security Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Did the Respondent fail to remit union dues deducted from members of the Claimant union?
  2. 2 Did the Respondent victimize, intimidate, or threaten members of the Claimant union?
  3. 3 Is the Claimant entitled to the reliefs sought?

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant had established a prima facie case that the Respondent failed to effect the remittance of union dues as required by law and had victimized union members. The Respondent's failure to file a response or defence meant the Claimant's evidence was unchallenged. The court applied Article 41 of the Constitution and Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act, holding that unionisable employees have the right to join a union and have dues deducted and remitted by the employer. The court granted the orders sought by the Claimant, including deduction and remittance of union dues, non-victimization of union members, and costs.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed. Orders granted as prayed.

Orders

  • The Respondent shall deduct and remit union dues from the date the check-off forms were signed by unionisable members in accordance with Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act.
  • The union dues deducted shall be deposited in the Claimant’s gazetted account.