[2022] KEELRC 424 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 424 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent breached the employment contract by failing to pay the Grievant the statutory minimum wage for the period December 2011 to December 2014, as established by the relevant Legal Notices. The Respondent did not provide evidence to refute the Union's calculations or to show that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 424 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: JRS Security Group
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 296 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimant in part.
Legal Topics
Minimum Wage Compliance, Underpayment of Wages, House Allowance Entitlement, Gratuity Payment, Leave Entitlement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Minimum Wage Compliance Underpayment of Wages House Allowance Entitlement Gratuity Payment Leave Entitlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Applicant

JRS Security Group

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent underpaid the Grievant in breach of statutory minimum wage requirements.
  2. 2 Whether the Grievant was entitled to accrued leave, gratuity, and house allowance.
  3. 3 Whether payment to the Grievant's family discharged the Respondent from further liability.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent breached the employment contract by failing to pay the Grievant the statutory minimum wage for the period December 2011 to December 2014, as established by the relevant Legal Notices. The Respondent did not provide evidence to refute the Union's calculations or to show that the Grievant's wage was consolidated to include house allowance. The claim for accrued leave was dismissed due to lack of evidence that the Grievant applied for or was denied leave, or that leave was carried forward with approval. The gratuity claim was denied as the Respondent had already paid the Grievant's family Kshs 16,200/- in lieu of gratuity, and the family had discharged the...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimant in part.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay Kshs 64,511/- to the Claimant for underpayments.
  • Respondent to pay Kshs 25,988/- to the Claimant for unpaid house allowance.