[2023] KEELRC 2344 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent summarily dismissed the grievants without affording them an opportunity to be heard, contrary to the requirements of section 41 of the Employment Act. The grievants' statements demonstrated that they did not incite or organize a strike, but merely sought clarification on delayed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELRC 2344 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: Managing Director Radar Security Ltd.
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E002 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the claimant
- Judges
- MA Onyango
- Legal Topics
- Summary Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Unpaid Wages, Trade Union Representation, Conciliation Process, Employment Benefits
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya National Private Security Workers Union
Applicant
Managing Director Radar Security Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the summary dismissal of the grievants was lawful and procedurally fair.
- 2 Whether the grievants were denied an opportunity to be heard as required by law.
- 3 Whether the respondent failed to pay the grievants their due wages and benefits.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent summarily dismissed the grievants without affording them an opportunity to be heard, contrary to the requirements of section 41 of the Employment Act. The grievants' statements demonstrated that they did not incite or organize a strike, but merely sought clarification on delayed salaries. The respondent failed to attend conciliation and did not defend the suit, and the evidence on record established that the grievants were not paid their due wages and benefits. The court held that the dismissals were procedurally unfair and unlawful, and that the claimant was entitled to the reliefs sought on behalf of the grievants, including payment of outstanding...
Court Disposition
judgment for the claimant
Orders
- The respondent shall pay Geofrey Makhoha Wanjofu Ksh. 360,765.
- The respondent shall pay Erick Musonye Ksh. 360,765.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
Kenya National Private Security Workers Union v Managing Director Radar Security Ltd. (Cause E002 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2344 (KLR) (28 September 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELRC 2344 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Cause E002 of 2022
MA Onyango, J
September 28, 2023
Between
Kenya National Private Security Workers Union
Claimant
and
Managing Director Radar Security Ltd.
Respondent
Judgment
1. Vide a Memorandum of Claim dated 5th January, 2022 and filed on 7th January, 2022, the Claimant who is a trade union registered under the Labour Relations Act seeks orders on behalf of its members Geofrey Makhoha Wanjofu, Erick Makau and Victor Otieno Osewe under the following heads:i.Notice one monthii.Underpayment of wagesiii.Overtime for 2016,2017 and 2018iv.Public holidaysv.Salary for February and March 2019vi.Annual leave for 3 years
2. It is the Claimant’s case that the Grievants were summarily dismissed on allegations that they organized, involved, participated and incited their colleagues to strike, allegations which they denied.
3. It is further the Claimants case that the Respondent did not give the Grievants a chance to defend themselves as required under section 41 and 43(1) of the Employment Act.
4. The Claimant avers that the Respondent failed to turn up for conciliation and the conciliator issued a certificate of unresolved dispute as required under section 69 and 73 of the Labour Relations Act.
5. Upon being served with Summons to Enter Appearance the Respondent filed a Memorandum of Appearance through Chomba & Mbugua Advocates. The Respondent however did not file a defence to the Memorandum of Claim.
6. The case was certified ready for hearing as an undefended claim on 6th February, 2023.
7. On 13th March 2023 the court directed the Claimant to serve counsel for the Respondent physically and file an affidavit of service.
8. On 25th April, 2023, after satisfying itself that the Respondent was properly served and had failed to attend court, the court directed that the undefended suit proceeds by way of pleadings, documents affidavits and written submission.
9. I have considered the Memorandum of Claim and attached documents. I have further considered submissions filed by the Claimant.
10. It is clear from the record that the Grievants were never given an opportunity to defend themselves.
11. It is apparent from the record that the Grievants were asked to record statements on the reasons why they did not report for duty on 14th April 2019.
12. Each of them wrote statements as reproduced below.GEOFFREY MAKOKHA WANJOFUBOX 42-50211NAITIRI -KENYA26TH APRIL,2019. THE MANAGERRADAR SECURITY LTDBOX 76690-00508NAIROBI -KENYAELDORET BRANCHREF: REASON WHY 1 DID NOT REPORT ON DUTY ON 14TH APRIL 2019 ON TIMEDear Sir (Madam,I Mr. Wanjofu of C/N 10559 Radar security guard it was on Sunday morning 14th April 2019 1 come early in the morning to the factory as usual I sign in .1 found my fellow colleagues assembling together I joined them to find out what was happening but the matter was the issue concerning the salary delay.We informed our supervisors to call us our branch manager Mr. Hussein who came and discuss with us then the issue was solved. We dispersed to our various location of work at around 8:00 am.I did not incite anybody because we were all having the same problem and there was no communication from the above office. We were paid the following day. Otherwise the work is going on well we had no problem up to now.Yours faithfullyGeoffrey Makokha WanjofuSigned26th April, 20190728-639-514. Osewe victorp/n 19978THE MANAGERRADAR SECURITY LTDPO BOX 76690ELDORETDear sir/Ref statementI Musonye of P/No 10766 Radar Security at Raiply, do confirm that on 13th Saturday, April, 2019 at 1800hrs after signing out of duty found my colleagues gathered at Gate “B” where I joined them to understand more about what the issue was. there was s discussion about why the salary had delayed long. after that discussion all the present guards agreed to be on duty early in the morning. sign in and wait at Gate “B” for an address form our leaders for the said matter. I as an individual do confirm that I didn’t incite any guard or block any one from going to his or her own assignment, all guards who were present came here willingly.After our manager came and addressed the said issue, all was well and I and other guards left for their entire assignments on that day, with no other pending issue.With thanksErick MusonyeC/NO 10766RADAR –Raiplysigned26-4-2019RADAR LIMITEDELDORET BRANCH MANAGERREFF: MY KNOWLEDGE ON INCIDENT OF DATE 14-04-2019ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED DATE I REPORTED TO WORK AS USUAL AT 0600HRS. I SIGNED IN ON THE CHECK LIST BUT DID NOT GO TO MY ASSIGN POST SINCE I WANTED A CLEAR INFORMATION FROM MY MANAGER CONCERNING THE LATENESS OF MY SALARY FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH. HE CAME AND GAVE ME A CLEAR INFORMATION ABOUT THE SITUATION TO WHICH I UNDERSTAND WITH SATISFACTION. I THEN REPORTED TO MY ASSIGNED POST AND I’VE BEEN REPORTING TO WORK DAILY WITHOUT ABSENTEEISM NOR LATENESS.CONCERNING THE INCITEMENT OF MY FELLOW GUARDS AND GUARDETTES NOT TO GO TO THEIR ASSIGNED POSTS. I CANNOT REMEMBER ME INCITING ANYBODY ON ABOVE DATE OR ANY DATE. IF IT CAN BE PROVED TO ME THAT I DID SO IN ANY WAY OR THE OTHER AS IT IS BEING CLAIMED. I WOULD BE PLEASEDTHAT’S ALL I CAN GIVE ABOUT THE ABOVE MENTIONED INCIDENT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.YOURS SINCERELYOSEWE VICTORP/N 9978
13. The Grievants were all summarily dismissed by letters dated 27th April, 2019 which are identified in all respects except the name of the Grievants and the reference number. The letter to Geofrey Makhoha is reproduced below:REF:RAD/HR/SD/IO559/0427TH APRIL, 2019GEOFREY MAKOKHA WANJOFURAO/HR/10559/04ELDORETDear Sir/Madam,RE: SUMMARY DISMISSALOn 14th April, 2019 whilst assigned day guarding duties at Raiply wood, Eldoret, you organized, involved participated and incited your colleagues to strike causing disturbance and paralyzing the operations at our client factory premises and also refused to take over duties.Be advised that your action has put security of our client at risk and this is tantamount to Gross misconduct which leaves the company with no other option but to summarily dismiss you from employment under employment Act revised Edition 2012(2017) Laws of Kenya.Arrange to return the company property in your possession before payment of your final dues.Yours faithfully,RADAR LTDSignedA. HUSSEINBRANC MANAGER
14. A trade dispute was reported to the Minster by the Claimant and C. Chemursoi of Eldoret Labour Office appointed as conciliator.
15. According to the documents on record, Mr. Chemursoi called for a meeting on 30th July, 2019 which was attended by a representative of the Claimant while the Respondent did not turn up. The Conciliator therefore issued a certificate of unresolved dispute.
16. According to the documents on record, Erick Musonye was employed by the Respondent as a security guard on 8th August 2016 at a monthly salary of Ksh. 10,000 which was increased to Ksh. 15,000 per month from 2017. At the time of summary dismissal he had not been paid salary for February and March, 2019
17. Victor Otieno Osewe was employed by the Respondent on 15th October, 2016 at a monthly salary of Ksh. 10,000 which was increased in 2018 to Ksh. 15,444. He earned the said salary to the date of dismissal on 19th April, 2019.
18. Geofrey Makhoha Wanjofu was employed by the Respondent on 5th May, 2016 as a security guard at a salary of Ksh. 10,000 which was increased in 2017 t Ksh. 15,544.
19. The Respondent having been properly served and having failed to attend the conciliation and to defend the suit herein, I enter Judgment for the Claimant against the Respondent as prayed and award each of the Grievants the following.i.Geofrey Makhoha Wanjofu Ksh. 360,765ii.Erick Musonye Ksh 360,765iii.Victor Otieno Osewe Ksh. 360,765. iv.Grand total Ksh. 1. 082,295. v.I further award the Claimant Ksh. 50,000 on account of reasonable reimbursable costs and necessary expenses of the suit.vi.The decretal sum shall attract interest at court rates from date of Judgment till payment in full.
DATED, DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AND SIGNED AT KITALE THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023. M. ONYANGOJUDGE