[2023] KEELRC 2344 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 2344 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent summarily dismissed the grievants without affording them an opportunity to be heard, contrary to the requirements of section 41 of the Employment Act. The grievants' statements demonstrated that they did not incite or organize a strike, but merely sought clarification on delayed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2344 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: Managing Director Radar Security Ltd.
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E002 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
MA Onyango
Legal Topics
Summary Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Unpaid Wages, Trade Union Representation, Conciliation Process, Employment Benefits
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Summary Dismissal Procedural Fairness Unpaid Wages Trade Union Representation Conciliation Process Employment Benefits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Applicant

Managing Director Radar Security Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the summary dismissal of the grievants was lawful and procedurally fair.
  2. 2 Whether the grievants were denied an opportunity to be heard as required by law.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent failed to pay the grievants their due wages and benefits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent summarily dismissed the grievants without affording them an opportunity to be heard, contrary to the requirements of section 41 of the Employment Act. The grievants' statements demonstrated that they did not incite or organize a strike, but merely sought clarification on delayed salaries. The respondent failed to attend conciliation and did not defend the suit, and the evidence on record established that the grievants were not paid their due wages and benefits. The court held that the dismissals were procedurally unfair and unlawful, and that the claimant was entitled to the reliefs sought on behalf of the grievants, including payment of outstanding...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay Geofrey Makhoha Wanjofu Ksh. 360,765.
  • The respondent shall pay Erick Musonye Ksh. 360,765.