[2018] KEELRC 994 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 994 (KLR)

The court held that the period spent in mandatory conciliation, which is beyond the claimant's control, should not be included in calculating the limitation period. The conciliator's report was issued on 25th March, 2015, and thus the three-year limitation period would lapse on 25th March, 2018. Since the claim was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 994 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: The Watchdog Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1308 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed with costs
Judges
NJ Abuodha
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Conciliation Process, Redundancy Dues
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation Periods Conciliation Process Redundancy Dues

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Claimant

The Watchdog Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the suit is barred by limitation under section 90 of the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the period spent in conciliation and before the Chief Magistrates Court should be excluded from the limitation period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the period spent in mandatory conciliation, which is beyond the claimant's control, should not be included in calculating the limitation period. The conciliator's report was issued on 25th March, 2015, and thus the three-year limitation period would lapse on 25th March, 2018. Since the claim was filed on 17th July, 2017, it was within the limitation period. The preliminary objection by the respondent was therefore without merit and dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is dismissed with costs.