[2014] KEELRC 831 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 831 (KLR)

The court found that the grievant was dismissed for a genuine reason, namely his admitted liability for causing two traffic accidents while employed as a chase car driver. The evidence established that the respondent followed due process by subjecting the grievant to a disciplinary committee before termination. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 831 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: Wells Fargo Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 282 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Disciplinary Process, Reinstatement, Employee Misconduct
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Disciplinary Process Reinstatement Employee Misconduct

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Applicant

Wells Fargo Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the grievant's employment was justified under the law.
  2. 2 Whether the grievant is entitled to reinstatement and payment of salaries for the period out of employment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the grievant was dismissed for a genuine reason, namely his admitted liability for causing two traffic accidents while employed as a chase car driver. The evidence established that the respondent followed due process by subjecting the grievant to a disciplinary committee before termination. The court held that persistent and admitted poor performance constituted a valid ground for dismissal. Consequently, the claimant was not entitled to reinstatement or payment of salaries for the period out of employment. The suit was dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claimant’s suit is dismissed with costs.