[2019] KEELRC 470 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 470 (KLR)

The court found that the parties in Petition No. 54 of 2018 were not identical to those in the present suit, as the earlier petition involved different unions and the County Government of Nyamira as an interested party, whereas the current suit is between the Kenya National Union of Nurses and the Nyamira County...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 470 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya National Union of Nurses; Respondent: Nyamira County Public Service Board
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 29 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Return to Work Agreements, Salary Arrears, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Res Judicata Return to Work Agreements Salary Arrears Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya National Union of Nurses

Applicant

Nyamira County Public Service Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the present suit is res judicata in light of Kisumu Petition No. 54 of 2018.
  2. 2 Whether the issues raised in the current suit were determined in the previous petition.
  3. 3 Whether the parties in the current suit are the same as those in the previous petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties in Petition No. 54 of 2018 were not identical to those in the present suit, as the earlier petition involved different unions and the County Government of Nyamira as an interested party, whereas the current suit is between the Kenya National Union of Nurses and the Nyamira County Public Service Board. Furthermore, the court noted that the return to work formula referenced by the respondent was not adopted as an order of the court in the previous petition. The issues raised in the present suit, specifically the payment of salary arrears and implementation of the return to work agreement, were not determined in the earlier petition. Therefore, the doctrine...

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is dismissed.
  • The suit shall proceed to hearing on the merits.