[2015] KEELRC 559 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 559 (KLR)

The court accepted the parties' settlement, finding the withdrawal of the suit for lack of co-operation and availability of the grievants to be fair, adequate, and in accordance with the law. The court therefore marked the suit as withdrawn, with each party to bear its own costs, and entered an award in the terms...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 559 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Kenya Petroleum Oil Workers' Union; Respondent: Abdallah Fathia Salim; Respondent: Digo Road Kobil Service Station; Respondent: Kenol Kobil Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 118 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Settlement Before Hearing
Outcome
Suit withdrawn by consent of parties; no order as to costs.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Wrongful Termination, Unfair Termination, Withdrawal of Suit
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Wrongful Termination Unfair Termination Withdrawal of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Petroleum Oil Workers' Union

Claimant

Abdallah Fathia Salim

Respondent

Digo Road Kobil Service Station

Respondent

Kenol Kobil Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Settlement Before Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the grievants was wrongful and unfair.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be withdrawn due to lack of co-operation and availability of the grievants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court accepted the parties' settlement, finding the withdrawal of the suit for lack of co-operation and availability of the grievants to be fair, adequate, and in accordance with the law. The court therefore marked the suit as withdrawn, with each party to bear its own costs, and entered an award in the terms proposed by the parties.

Court Disposition

Suit withdrawn by consent of parties; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The claimant do withdraw the entire suit for lack of grievants' co-operation and availability for the proceedings.
  • The suit is marked as withdrawn by the claimant.