[2014] KEELRC 1093 (KLR)
The court held that Rule 14(6) of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 allows for amendment of pleadings at any stage with leave of court, provided that the other party is not prejudiced and is afforded a corresponding right to amend their pleadings. In this case, although the trial had commenced, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEELRC 1093 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Petroleum Oil Workers Union; Respondent: Kenya Pipeline Company Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 209 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Application to Amend Pleadings
- Outcome
- Application for leave to amend prayers in the memorandum of claim allowed.
- Judges
- HS Wasilwa
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Industrial Court Procedure, Leave of Court, Prejudice to Parties
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Petroleum Oil Workers Union
Applicant
Kenya Pipeline Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Application to Amend Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend the prayers in the memorandum of claim during the trial.
- 2 Whether granting the amendment would prejudice the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Rule 14(6) of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 allows for amendment of pleadings at any stage with leave of court, provided that the other party is not prejudiced and is afforded a corresponding right to amend their pleadings. In this case, although the trial had commenced, the court found that granting leave to amend would not prejudice the respondent, as they would have the opportunity to amend their defence if necessary. The court emphasized that the interests of justice are served by allowing parties to present their full case, and procedural rules should not be applied rigidly to defeat substantive justice. Accordingly, the application for leave to...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to amend prayers in the memorandum of claim allowed.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicant to amend the prayers in the memorandum of claim.
- The respondent is granted a corresponding right to amend their defence if they so wish.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
CAUSE NO. 209/2013
(BEFORE HON. JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA ON 25TH JUNE, 2014)
KENYA PETROLEUM OIL WORKERS UNION ............. CLAIMANTS
-VERSUS-
KENYA PIPELINE COMPANY LIMITED ................. RESPONDENTS
R U L I N G
The application in court is the one dated 4. 2.2012. It is for leave to amend prayers in the memo of claim dated 24. 7.2013. The application is brought through a Notice of Motion and brought under S. 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code 2010, Order 14 Rule 6 of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 and any other enabling Laws.
It is the applicants contention that they did not have documentary evidence to support the amended prayers at the time of filing their memo and that it is in the interest of natural justice to grant the orders sought. The applicants submitted that the respondents will not be prejudiced in any way.
The application is supported by an annexed affidavit sworn by Tom Pools Okongo Onyango.
The respondents opposed this application. It is their case that the amendment sought to be introduced will change the entire character of the case as the claimants have already commenced their case and cross-examination carried out. Further, it is respondents case that the amendments sought are mainly financial obligation of claimants to certain financial institutions and such obligations cannot be extended to an employer. Further, respondents contend that the claimant is increasing the cost of the trial which he may not cover as he is not a man of means.
Having examined submissions of both parties, the issue for determination is whether such an order as sought can be introduced in the middle of the trial.
Rule 14 (6) of the Industrial Court Procedure Rules 2010 provides that:-
“A party may, with the leave of the court amend pleadings; provided that where leave is granted, to a party to amend any pleadings, a responding party shall have a corresponding right to amend that party's pleadings.”
The provision is clear that amendment of pleadings may be granted at any time with the leave of court. The guiding principle is whether any party will be prejudiced by such an amendment. In the current case the claimant applicants seek this leave to amend their pleadings though their case has started. I do not find it prejudicial to the respondents if this prayer is granted as they will have a right to amend their defence if they so wish. I therefore allow the prayers sought by the applicants.
HELLEN WASILWA
JUDGE
25/6/2014
Appearances:-
Ombito h/b claimants present
Ajuoga h/b Khamala for respondents present
CC. Wamache