[2020] KEELRC 1892 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1892 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent had complied with the mandatory statutory requirements for redundancy under section 40(1) of the Employment Act, 2007 by notifying both the claimant union and the area labour officer. The court held that it could not issue orders staying or setting aside the closure notice or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1892 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union; Respondent: James Finleys (Kenya) Limited (Finleys Flowers)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 55 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Redundancy Procedure, Collective Bargaining Agreements, Terminal Dues, Statutory Notice Requirements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Redundancy Procedure Collective Bargaining Agreements Terminal Dues Statutory Notice Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union

Applicant

James Finleys (Kenya) Limited (Finleys Flowers)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's notice of final closure and redundancy complied with section 40(1) of the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the court should stay or set aside the respondent's closure notice pending the outcome of Civil Appeal No.47 of 2017.
  3. 3 Whether employees declared redundant are entitled to terminal dues based on the outcome of the pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had complied with the mandatory statutory requirements for redundancy under section 40(1) of the Employment Act, 2007 by notifying both the claimant union and the area labour officer. The court held that it could not issue orders staying or setting aside the closure notice or declare entitlement to the outcome of Civil Appeal No.47 of 2017, as these matters fall within the jurisdiction of the appellate court. The application was therefore dismissed, as the respondent's actions were in accordance with the law and the court could not pre-empt the appellate process.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Orders sought in the application dated 4th November, 2019 shall not issue.
  • Costs in the cause.