[2020] KECA 133 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 133 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal on the question of whether a judgment set aside for want of jurisdiction can be the basis for assessment of instruction fees between advocate and client. The Court further held that absent a stay of execution, the intended appeal would...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 133 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme; Applicant: Albert Chaurembo Mumba; Applicant: Abdallah H. Mwaruwa; Applicant: M.K. Mure; Applicant: Mary Wairimu Ng’ang’a; Applicant: Alex Ole-Teipan; Applicant: Mary Otiede; Applicant: Margaret Nyaga; Applicant: Majengo Katana (sued on their own behalf and on behalf of the Predecessors and/or successors in title in their capacities as the Registered Trustees of Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme); Respondent: Kinyua Muyaa & Co. Advocates
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 207 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DK Musinga, GK Oenga, F Sichale
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Instruction Fees, Jurisdiction of Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Stay of Execution Appeals Process Instruction Fees Jurisdiction of Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme

Applicant

Albert Chaurembo Mumba

Applicant

Abdallah H. Mwaruwa

Applicant

M.K. Mure

Applicant

Mary Wairimu Ng’ang’a

Applicant

Alex Ole-Teipan

Applicant

Mary Otiede

Applicant

Margaret Nyaga

Applicant

Majengo Katana (sued on their own behalf and on behalf of the Predecessors and/or successors in title in their capacities as the Registered Trustees of Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme)

Applicant

Kinyua Muyaa & Co. Advocates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a judgment set aside for want of jurisdiction can form the basis for assessment of instruction fees between advocate and client.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an arguable appeal that would be rendered nugatory absent a stay of execution.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal on the question of whether a judgment set aside for want of jurisdiction can be the basis for assessment of instruction fees between advocate and client. The Court further held that absent a stay of execution, the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory as the respondent could proceed to execute the impugned ruling. Applying the principles set out in Stanley Kang’ethe Kinyanjui vs. Tony Keter & 5 others [2013] eKLR, the Court allowed the application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 20th July, 2020 is allowed.
  • Costs of the motion shall be in the intended appeal.