[2020] KECA 133 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal on the question of whether a judgment set aside for want of jurisdiction can be the basis for assessment of instruction fees between advocate and client. The Court further held that absent a stay of execution, the intended appeal would...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KECA 133 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme; Applicant: Albert Chaurembo Mumba; Applicant: Abdallah H. Mwaruwa; Applicant: M.K. Mure; Applicant: Mary Wairimu Ng’ang’a; Applicant: Alex Ole-Teipan; Applicant: Mary Otiede; Applicant: Margaret Nyaga; Applicant: Majengo Katana (sued on their own behalf and on behalf of the Predecessors and/or successors in title in their capacities as the Registered Trustees of Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme); Respondent: Kinyua Muyaa & Co. Advocates
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 207 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- DK Musinga, GK Oenga, F Sichale
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Instruction Fees, Jurisdiction of Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme
Applicant
Albert Chaurembo Mumba
Applicant
Abdallah H. Mwaruwa
Applicant
M.K. Mure
Applicant
Mary Wairimu Ng’ang’a
Applicant
Alex Ole-Teipan
Applicant
Mary Otiede
Applicant
Margaret Nyaga
Applicant
Majengo Katana (sued on their own behalf and on behalf of the Predecessors and/or successors in title in their capacities as the Registered Trustees of Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme)
Applicant
Kinyua Muyaa & Co. Advocates
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a judgment set aside for want of jurisdiction can form the basis for assessment of instruction fees between advocate and client.
- 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an arguable appeal that would be rendered nugatory absent a stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal on the question of whether a judgment set aside for want of jurisdiction can be the basis for assessment of instruction fees between advocate and client. The Court further held that absent a stay of execution, the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory as the respondent could proceed to execute the impugned ruling. Applying the principles set out in Stanley Kang’ethe Kinyanjui vs. Tony Keter & 5 others [2013] eKLR, the Court allowed the application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 20th July, 2020 is allowed.
- Costs of the motion shall be in the intended appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
47 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT MOMBASA
[CORAM: MUSINGA, KIAGE & SICHALE, JJ.A.]
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. E. 207 OF 2020
BETWEEN
KENYA PORTS AUTHORITY PENSION SCHEME.........................1STAPPLICANT
ALBERT CHAUREMBO MUMBA......................................................2NDAPPLICANT
ABDALLAH H. MWARUWA.................................................................3RDAPPLICANT
M.K. MURE.............................................................................................4THAPPLICANT
MARY WAIRIMU NG’ANG’A............................................................. 5THAPPLICANT
ALEX OLE-TEIPAN..............................................................................6THAPPLICANT
MARY OTIENDE...................................................................................7THAPPLICANT
MARGARET NYAGA............................................................................8THAPPLICANT
MAJENGO KATANA (sued on their own behalf and on behalf of the
Predecessors and/or successors in title in their capacities as the Registered
Trustees of KenyaPorts AuthorityPension Scheme............................9THAPPLICANT
AND
KINYUA MUYAA & CO. ADVOCATES.................................................RESPONDENT
(Being an application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of an appeal
from theRuling and order of the Employment & Labour Relations Court of Kenya
at Mombasa (James Rika, J) dated 17th July, 2020
IN
ELRC Misc. Civil Application No. 13 of 2015)
*****************************
RULING OF THE COURT
1. UPONperusing the Notice of Motion dated20thJuly, 2020by the applicant, Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme, brought under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, where the applicant seeks an orderof stay of execution of the ruling and orders made on17thJuly, 2020in Misc. Civil application No. 13 of 2015;Kinyua Muyaa & CompanyAdvocates,Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme & 8 otherspending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal against the ruling of17thJuly, 2020; and
2. UPONperusing the supporting affidavit ofStephen Kyandihsworn on20thJuly, 2020and the supplementary affidavit sworn on21stSeptember, 2020byPeter Mbuthia Gachuhi; and
3. UPONperusing the replying affidavit sworn on10thAugust, 2020and the
“further replying affidavit in reply” sworn on22ndSeptember, 2020both byF. Kinyua Kamundi, a partner in the firm ofKinyua Muyaa & Co.Advocateson behalf of the respondents; and
4. UPONperusing the applicant’s submissions where the applicant contends that it has an arguable appeal as it intends to challenge on appeal whether a judgment that has been set aside for being a nullity for want of jurisdiction can be a basis for assessing instruction fees between an advocate and a client; further that the applicant is apprehensive that, absent stay, the respondent will move to execute the impugned ruling of17thJuly,2020;and
5. UPONperusing the respondent’s submissions in which it is submitted,inter alia,that the intended appeal is frivolous; and
6. HAVINGconsidered the principles that guide this Court in the determination of Rule 5(2)(b) applications as set out inStanley Kang’etheKinyanjui vs. Tony Keter & 5 others [2013] eKLRand noting that the applicant has demonstrated that it has an arguable appeal, that will be rendered nugatory, absent stay, we make the following orders:
(i) The Notice of Motion dated20thJuly, 2020is allowed.
(ii) Costs of the motion shall be in the intended appeal.
Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 4thDay of December, 2020.
D. K. MUSINGA
...................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
P.O. KIAGE
....................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
F. SICHALE
..................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a truecopy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR