[2025] KEHC 9237 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant complied with the primary condition of filing the memorandum of appeal within the stipulated 14 days. Although the deposit of Kshs. 500,000 as security was made after the 21-day period, the court held that the delay was not inordinate and did not prejudice the respondent. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 9237 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd; Respondent: Judith Muthoni Kaburia (Suing on behalf of the Estate Of The Late Dennis Njeru Kaari)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E435 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Memorandum of Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- JN Mulwa
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Out of Time, Striking Out Pleadings, Compliance With Court Orders, Stay of Execution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd
Appellant
Judith Muthoni Kaburia (Suing on behalf of the Estate Of The Late Dennis Njeru Kaari)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Memorandum of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant complied with the conditions attached to the grant of leave to file the appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the delay in depositing the security in court rendered the appeal incompetent.
- 3 Whether the memorandum of appeal should be struck out for being time barred or an abuse of court process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant complied with the primary condition of filing the memorandum of appeal within the stipulated 14 days. Although the deposit of Kshs. 500,000 as security was made after the 21-day period, the court held that the delay was not inordinate and did not prejudice the respondent. The court emphasized its discretion under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution to avoid undue reliance on procedural technicalities. Consequently, the court determined that the appeal was competently filed and that the application to strike out the memorandum of appeal lacked merit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application dated 2/05/2024 is dismissed with costs to the appellant.
- The appeal shall be mentioned for directions before the Deputy Registrar at the Civil Appellate Division on 28/07/2025.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd v Kaburia (Suing on behalf of the Estate of the Late Dennis Njeru Kaari) (Civil Appeal E435 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 9237 (KLR) (Civ) (26 June 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 9237 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Civil
Civil Appeal E435 of 2024
JN Mulwa, J
June 26, 2025
Between
Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd
Appellant
and
Judith Muthoni Kaburia (Suing on behalf of the Estate Of The Late Dennis Njeru Kaari)
Respondent
Ruling
1. Before the court for determination is the Respondent’s application dated 2/05/2024 wherein she seeks orders for striking out the Memorandum of Appeal dated 28/03/2024 for being incompetent, time barred and an abuse of court process.
2. It is premised on grounds found on its face, and supporting affidavit of Henry Karauka Advocate for the Applicant sworn on 2/05/2024. No legal provisions are cited upon which the application is grounded.
3. The Applicant premises the motion on grounds that despite the court granting leave to the appellant to file the appeal out of time, the Appellant failed to comply with terms attached to the grant of leave and as such the appeal stands as incompetent, and ought to be struck out.The applicant filed submissions dated 14/10/2024 to buttress its motion.
4. The Applicant/Respondent filed a replying affidavit sworn by one Justus Omagwa in opposition of the application and further filed submissions on the same dated 10/02/2025.
5. The court has considered the parties affidavits and submissions. It is mutually agreed by both parties that vide a Miscl. Civil Application No. E203 of 2024. On 15/03/2024, the court (Majanja J) granted leave to the appellant to file the appeal out of time upon conditions that the appellant was to pay to the Respondent a sum of Kshs. 1 million plus costs assessed at Kshs. 10,000/= within 21 days which was duly paid in two instalments of Kshs. 510,000/= and Kshs. 500,000/= respectfully though the 2nd instalment was delayed but eventually paid.
6. Considering the above, would the appeal be deemed to be incompetently filed?The orders of Majanja J were granted on 15/03/2024 and the appeal by a Memorandum of Appeal dated 28/03/2024 was filed on an even date as seen from the CTS platform, within the stipulated 14 days.
7. In the court’s view therefore, the first arm of the court’s orders on filing the appeal were strictly complied with by filing the Memorandum of Appeal.
8. On the matter of the orders of stay of execution, being the second arm of the motion dated 13/03/2024, was substantively complied with by payment to the Applicant the full sum of Kshs. 1,000,000/= and the deposit in court of Kshs. 500,000/= though not within the 21 days but soon thereafter as seen at the CTS which period in the courts view was not inordinately late.
9. It is therefore not true as submitted by the Applicant that Kshs. 500,000/= was never deposited in court as security.Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act grants the court inherent powers and discretion to make orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of court process. Further Article 159 2(d) of the Constitution mandates courts to dispense justice without undue reliance on procedural technicalities.
10. For the foregoing, the court finds no merit in the applicant’s application dated 2/05/2024. It is dismissed with costs.The appeal shall be mentioned for directions before the DR at the Civil Appellate Division on the 28/07/2025. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 26THDAY OF JUNE, 2025. .............................JANET MULWA.JUDGE