[2019] KEHC 5589 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 5589 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant had failed to take any action to prosecute the appeal after its admission for hearing, including failing to file and serve the record of appeal despite being served with notices and the court fixing hearing dates on its own motion. The absence of the appellant or their counsel on...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 5589 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd; Respondent: Victoria Atieno Amina; Respondent: Stephene Obege Onserio
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 19 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Procedure, Record of Appeal, Service of Notice
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeal Procedure Record of Appeal Service of Notice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd

Appellant

Victoria Atieno Amina

Respondent

Stephene Obege Onserio

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's inaction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant had failed to take any action to prosecute the appeal after its admission for hearing, including failing to file and serve the record of appeal despite being served with notices and the court fixing hearing dates on its own motion. The absence of the appellant or their counsel on the scheduled date further demonstrated a lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, as the appellant had not demonstrated any intention to proceed with the matter.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • No orders as to costs.