[2023] KEHC 2395 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 2395 (KLR)

The High Court found that the trial magistrate's award of Kshs. 2,000,000 in general damages was inordinately high given the nature and extent of the respondent's injuries, which were less severe than those in authorities cited where higher awards were made. The court noted that while the respondent suffered...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 2395 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd; Respondent: Hagai Omondi Jowi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E080 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal_partially_allowed
Judges
KW Kiarie
Legal Topics
Assessment of Damages, Personal Injury, Electrocution Liability, Appellate Review, Quantum of Damages
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Assessment of Damages Personal Injury Electrocution Liability Appellate Review Quantum of Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd

Appellant

Hagai Omondi Jowi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the award of general damages by the trial magistrate was inordinately high in light of the injuries sustained by the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the trial magistrate applied the correct legal principles and precedents in assessing general damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the trial magistrate's award of Kshs. 2,000,000 in general damages was inordinately high given the nature and extent of the respondent's injuries, which were less severe than those in authorities cited where higher awards were made. The court noted that while the respondent suffered electric burns and required further medical attention, the injuries did not warrant an award comparable to cases involving more extensive burns and permanent disabilities. The appellate court exercised its discretion to interfere with the quantum of damages, setting aside the trial court's award and substituting it with Kshs. 1,000,000 as a reasonable sum, reflecting the severity of...

Court Disposition

appeal_partially_allowed

Orders

  • The award of Kshs. 2,000,000 in general damages by the trial magistrate is set aside and substituted with an award of Kshs. 1,000,000.
  • The appeal succeeds to the extent of the reduction in damages.