[2025] KEELC 3776 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 3776 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided justifiable reasons for the delay in filing the reference against the Taxing Master’s ruling. The court held that the applicant deserved an opportunity to contest the bill of costs, and that the interests of justice would be served by granting leave to file the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 3776 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Power & Lighting Company; Respondent: Kang’ethe & Company Advocates; Respondent: Eunice Nkirote Ringere
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 6 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Reference Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Leave to File Reference, Extension of Time, Advocates Remuneration Order
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Leave to File Reference Extension of Time Advocates Remuneration Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Power & Lighting Company

Applicant

Kang’ethe & Company Advocates

Respondent

Eunice Nkirote Ringere

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Reference Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established sufficient cause to warrant leave to file a reference against the Taxing Master’s ruling out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the reference is justifiable.
  3. 3 Whether the ruling of the Taxing Master should be stayed pending determination of the intended reference.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided justifiable reasons for the delay in filing the reference against the Taxing Master’s ruling. The court held that the applicant deserved an opportunity to contest the bill of costs, and that the interests of justice would be served by granting leave to file the reference out of time. Consequently, the court allowed the application, granted leave to file the reference within twenty-one days, and stayed the Taxing Master’s ruling pending the determination of the intended reference.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file a reference out of time against the ruling of the Taxing Master dated 6th May 2024.
  • The ruling of the Taxing Master dated 6th May 2024 is stayed pending the hearing and determination of the intended reference, which should be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this ruling.