[2017] KEHC 7225 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to counsel's honest mistake. The court held that such a mistake should not be visited upon the litigant, especially where the applicant has demonstrated willingness to comply with any conditions imposed by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 7225 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Power Limited; Respondent: Stella Ayuma Omboya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 102 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- A Mbogholi-Msagha
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Rights, Mistake of Counsel
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Power Limited
Applicant
Stella Ayuma Omboya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to file an appeal out of time due to counsel's inadvertence.
- 2 Whether the mistake of counsel should be visited upon the litigant in the circumstances.
- 3 Whether security for the decretal sum should be ordered pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to counsel's honest mistake. The court held that such a mistake should not be visited upon the litigant, especially where the applicant has demonstrated willingness to comply with any conditions imposed by the court, including depositing the decretal sum as security. The court exercised its discretion to allow the application, recognizing both the applicant's right of appeal and the respondent's interest in enjoying the fruits of judgment. The court ordered that the memorandum of appeal be filed within seven days and that the decretal sum be deposited in a joint interest-earning...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Leave is granted to file the memorandum of appeal within 7 days of this ruling.
- The applicant shall deposit the decretal sum in an interest earning account in the joint names of counsel for the parties within 30 days from the date of this ruling, if not already ordered by the lower court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MISC APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2016
KENYA POWER LIMITED ……………….………. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
STELLA AYUMA OMBOYA …………..….……….DEFENDANT
RULING
The appellant was the defendant in the lower court while the respondent was the plaintiff. The lower awarded the respondent a sum of Kshs. 472,140/= being general damages, special damages and costs after a full trial. The applicant was aggrieved by the said judgement but did not file an appeal within the stipulated time blaming this omission on inadvertence of the part of counsel. This is an application for leave to file the appeal out of time. A draft memorandum of appeal has been annexed.
It is the applicant’s case that the appeal has good chances of success and the mistake of an advocate should not be visited upon the litigant. It is also the applicant’s case that if orders sought are not issued the applicant will suffer irreparably and it will not be possible to prosecute the intended appeal. The application is opposed and there is a replying affidavit sworn by one Jared Ombwayo Madara the next friend of the minor respondent.
Following an order for parties to file written submissions only the applicant complied. Before the filing of this application the applicant filed an application before the lower court for a stay of execution of that judgment. I do not have the result of that application but one of the pleadings in that application is that the applicant was willing to comply with any condition of the court and in particular depositing the decretal sum in a fixed deposit interest earning account in the joint names of the parties.
The applicant has the right of appeal and the draft memorandum of appeal presents what the court considers arguable issues. I recognize the fact that a successful litigant should enjoy the fruits of his or her judgment but at the same time justice looks at both sides.
The order sought is discretionary and I have looked at the cited authorities in that regard. I agree that a mistake by counsel should not be visited upon the litigant and especially where such a mistake and or omission has been satisfactorily explained. In this application counsel has honestly admitted the mistake and I believe the application should be granted. See John Kasimu Kilatya Vs. Chairman Machakos Land Disputes Tribunal and two others (2015) e KLR and Rosemary Muthoni Njuguna Vs. Kamuthi Farmers Co- Operative Society Limited (2009) e KLR. In the event an order for security was not made in the lower court at the hearing of the application for stay, the same shall be included in the order I am just about to make.
The application is hereby allowed, and the memorandum of appeal shall be filed within 7 days of this ruling. The applicant shall cause the decretal sum to be deposited in an interest earning account in the joint names of counsel for the parties within 30 days from the date of this ruling. This is in the event such an order was not made by the lower court. The costs shall be on appeal.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 21st Day of February, 2017
A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA
JUDGE